Quote:
Sure, you can look at the design and its characteristics to easily see the behaviors that prohibited spins and flick rolls.
It is not that hard.
|
Actually the reason is even simpler, intentional spins were simply 'discouraged', there simply is no physical reason why the aircraft (any of them) could not be spun.
Quote:
|
As for the Spitfire's longitudinal stability, there is nothing to dispute or argue about at this point. The only discussion that is really open is what can be modeled in the game.
|
Well I would tend to agree on the basis that there is 'nothing' particularily remarkeable about the Spitfires stability, so yes I see no need to continue a thread like this one, it seems to be going nowhere....appart from trying to paint an innacurate picture of the Spitfire, what should be modelled in the game is a Spitfire with light elevator controls that gives plenty of pre stall warning simple as that, the Spitfire did nothing out of the ordinary in a high speed stall, you only have to look at other aircrafts pilots notes to see that.
Quote:
|
Just as all the pointy tin foil hat CG position theory from people who do not understand MAC calculations, we are now just arguing because folks don't understand the results of the RAE Cm graphs, NACA measurements, RAE oscillation graphs, Operating Notes, and pilot reports.
|
Bold claims, are you sure nobody else but you understands them?