[NZtyphoon]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

You don't seem to grasp the difference between research and adopted standard.

This is an adopted Standard:

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text....3.11.2.158.27

So what? You have absolutely no evidence for this ridiculous claim that the British had no adopted standards, although I have searched through all of your posts to find a "document" you claim to have posted - without success...

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Go search the forum. I have posted the document.

this is exactly like Crumpp's assertions over 100 octane and 16 fighter squadrons - all this does is show his level of ignorance and biased POV about the British aviation industry and administration, and about the Spitfire.

Originally Posted by Crumpp

It is not to debate the history of stabilty and control engineering.

Crumpp's introductory comments to this thread:

Originally Posted by Crumpp

Amoung the Western Front warring powers during World War II, only two nations had measurable and definable stability and control standards. Stability and control was a young science. Airplanes had simply been two slow and light previously. The forces were small enough such that there was little need. The two nation were the United States and Germany.

Let's not be obtuse. None of this is to claim other nations did not progress in aviation or contribute. It is only to lay the historical foundation as to why these were the only Western Nations to adopt stability and control standards.

Yeah, right - the poor ol' British had no proper stability and control standards and no clues, until the heroic Americans helped sort it out for
them...