View Single Post
  #35  
Old 05-30-2012, 09:55 AM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
I am wondering what your expectations are here. Yes, the relative performance is about right. What is the issue???
No it is not! Please have another look at the Spec graphs of E-4 and Mk.IIa and then have a look at the tests. You see?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
"Why is my level speed matching performance corrected to standard on a high density altitude day?"

"Why is my radiator temperature hitting the upper limits in level flight on maximum continuous?"

"Why can I asymmetrically overload the airframe at 400 mph and nothing happens?"
Agreed on all this. I hope all this issues will be adressed at some point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
There is a lot bigger fish to fry for the programmers than a small error in specific climb rates.
The error is not small! The gap is now ridiculous and very much unhistorical. Perhaps it does not matter to you for you don't actually fly this sim.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote