View Single Post
  #21  
Old 05-22-2012, 07:30 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
So why don't you just say:

YES, you are right.

It would be so much less tiresome to type for you.

Because you also claim in the other thread that combat reports that mention the use of boost control cut-out are not a proof for 100 octane fuel. And this claim is incorrect when applied to Merlin II/III aero-engines. Only the combat reports that describe a failure of the boost control are no proof for 87 or 100 octane fuel, all others are a definitive proof for 100 octane.

Last edited by 41Sqn_Banks; 05-22-2012 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote