Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow
To my understanding the engine in question had a strongly modified carburretor, its functioning hence being quite different from that of the early spits. So not so useful to my understanding. If you believe otherwise please indicate the text sections that support your view.
I think comparing two flight simulators and saying that one is wrong because they differ is a bit uhm ... well, far far from any proof of whatsoever.
|
Stormcrow, I'm not offering that as proof (although two 'accurate' sim FMs should give a similar result), it was just a comparison which, among other things, makes me think it isn't correct.
I'm not trying to start a war. I'm just asking them to re-check it or perhaps even confirm that it has been looked at under the new patch. It was admitted before October 2011 that it was wrong, it was adjusted at the October 2011 patch and I think I read somewhere that it was set at 0.5G pending further work but I can't confirm that. In any case it just needs a response from the devs.
There's no need for some of the acrimonious reaction that occured in the tracker - and yes, I apologise for questioning the negative-voting 'blues' motives but it was a knee-jerk reaction to their tracker posts attacking this request and my perceptions instead of just expressing their view by voting on it and possibly even offering something to support their voting reasons. Their view (and tbh yours) that it is ok is no more valid than my feeling that it isn't. We can't prove it either way without a cockpit G-meter so we have to ask the devs.
I'm fairly sure it's wrong and I just want it looked at.