Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex
Haven't tried the third party SMAA solution so I can't compare, I don't like injections and you go under the blanket without permission  Another thing is that the FXAA looks better in reality than the screenshots actually... I guess it has something to do with that it is applied after each screen. After reading that NSL61 thought the radar installation as Dover looked great now I went there to capture a screen shot. They indeed look much better with FXAA, but every time I pause for a screenshot they look more jagged (which does not happen for the AC). I guess that when doing thin lines it creates the AA effect by altering the pixels a bit every other frame or something...? Try it yourself, it may be true for SMAA too... |
It does looks better in movement in SMAA too, it is usual in post-process techniques, but we can see the post-process quality in screenshots.
With the amount of virus out there is also usual being cautious but its totally harmless :
The
mrhaandi's SMAA injector was written by
Andrej Dudenhefner which is mate of
Jorge Jimenez.
Jorge Jimenez worked in the develoment of this SMAA technique at the
Zaragoza University in conjunction with
Crytek development (SMAA was used in Crysis 2)
Here is the website of the project :
http://www.iryoku.com/smaa/
And here is the
pdf that contain the technical report at
Zaragoza University :
http://www.iryoku.com/smaa/downloads...tialiasing.pdf
So I guess its safe
, its usual make injectors as tool to show your work.
If you wish we can make comparative screenshots to see what we got here, but I need a screenshot of the cockpit where see the instruments and would be nice a grounded screenshot with some buildings has hangars (with map location and day time).