The only one condescending here is you osprey. Picking portions of an argument to quote and argue, then ignoring the rest in it's entirety is putting a false light and unfair spin to a discussion.
I bring to the table a valid argument that the spit2a is pulled due to FM disparity. The 109e4 is pulled for no reason other then the spit2a has been pulled.
Anyone can pick holes in an argument when they only argue portions of the argument and not the whole.
I argue the the 109e4 is the same FM envelope as other 109 models. That is my argument. Prop pitch control and m-geshoss have nothing to do with the aircrafts flight performance abosolutes. Matter of fact it has been stated that auto prop pitch tends to lessen the aircrafts flight envelope in trade for simplification. So once again you argue for the sake of argue and do not address the core issue at hand.
I am a 110 driver so this is largely moot to me. I only state my lack of understanding for lumping the two aircraft together if only one is the offending aircraft.
|