View Single Post
  #60  
Old 02-06-2012, 08:39 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Your horizontal is high in pixel count
Agreed 100%

My horizontal pixel count is higher than your horizontal pixel count

Put another way, you only have 69% of the horizontal pixel that I have

Where

69% = 100*(2650/3840)

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
1024 on a monitor is very low res
Agreed 50%

My vertical pixel count is is lower than your vertical pixel count

Put another way, I only have 64% of the vertical pixels that you have

Where

64% = 100*(1024/1600)

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
or very small image.
Disagree 100%

And note you are switching between talking about the resolution to talking about the image size

And in that regard my setup puts yours to shame!

I have a much lager view (image size) than yours!

Size wise I 'choose' horizontal (perihelial) over vertical..

Why you ask?

Well it should be apparent, but allow me to explain just encase it is not

A larger vertical view means you can see more of your cockpit floor and top of your canopy (your case)
A larger horizontal view means you can see more of the useful sky, what is left and right of you (my case)

Of the two

I think we can all agree that seeing a plane to your left or right (horizontal), at any time, is more useful information

More useful than the context of your cockpit floor, like the visual position of your rudder pedals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Both inferior to mine.
Sorry, but that is incorrect

As you can see above, your horizontal pixel count is only 69% of mine, thus your horizontal pixel count is inferior to mine

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Wrong again dude,
Really?

I noticed you didn't provide a quote of something I said that was wrong

Do you know why you didn't quote me?

Because I didn't say anything that was wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
even the total pixels are much smaller than 2650 x 1600.
Agreed 100%

My total pixel count is lower than your total pixel count

But not by much..

Put another way, I only have 93% of the total number

3932160 = 3840 x 1024
4240000 = 2650 x 1600

93% = 100*(3932160/4240000)

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Wrong again, not missing the point. SWTOR was always able to force it with the video card drivers with a config hack. Unlike CoD.
Nope your still missing it.. And the fact that it was a hack and not part of the GUI proves it

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Wrong again,
Really?

I noticed you didn't provide a quote of something I said that was wrong

Do you know why you didn't quote me?

Because I didn't say anything that was wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
I was not talking about you I was referring to post #30, that is why I did not quote you.
Did not a could not

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Although you did say I might have shimmering due to a hardware problem which is also completely wrong.
Maybe, but all we know for sure is that there are people with settings and setups like yours that are not having the issues you are having.

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
You are wrong a lot.
Just to be clear

For those who may be reading this..

Note that icarus has yet to quote anything I said that would qualify as being wrong

As for what he 'thinks' I said or saying.. Well I can not be held responsible for that

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 02-06-2012 at 08:59 PM.