View Single Post
  #11  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:51 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
Possibly. I haven't looked into it but perhaps the 'undermodelling' of the Spitfires is because they are modelled with 87 Octane?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Frankly I am not sure about them. Do they (Mark Is, they seem to be modelled with 87 octane boost levels) not meet specs for a 87 octane one? Climb too slow? Or..?
No.
Couple of months ago i compared the www.spitperformance.org graphs with the game speeds (here). The graphs show the 6lbs boost (with 87 oct. fuel) speed of Spitfire. The 109 would be faster, but not that much – if we look at the proportions of course, because now the 109 is slower than it should).
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here

Last edited by VO101_Tom; 01-11-2012 at 04:13 PM.
Reply With Quote