Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz
Mate even without all this documentation...If we are wrong now with the FM's here in CloD then every ww2 sim Ive ever played had it wrong too which is highly unlikely
|
Do you decide how authentic an original report is based on the programming of a game? Should happen reverse for this in a normal case??? I do not dare to ask it, which simulators you thought of...
I did not say that the Spitfire aircraft is worse than the 109. What I have written to the contemporary memoir should be treated with caution. I maintain my assertion that the pilots' reports are inaccurate. There are many reasons why the performance of their machines being estimated incorrectly. If he wins, he feels it is likely that his plane was better. Later, you will be reading this everywhere. If he loses ... Well, he does not write books. The German pilot who survived the fighting, wrote the same thing like the English, but from his own standpoint. Now who is right?
If someone makes a simulator, the most accurate documentations the various test reports and manuals. This must be the primary source. If they are shaken some legends... that not the fault of the facts
I read earlier an interview with Kozhedub, it is an interesting detail:
- Reporter: What do you consider to have been the best fighter airplane–regardless of nationality–of World War II?
- Kozhedub: The La-7. I hope you understand why.
...And Oleg made it! \o/
(Here is the whole interview)