Quote:
Originally Posted by Jugdriver
This may be true in your version of history, but the idea that the 109 was a superior aircraft to the Spitfire is not true, they were very evenly matched during the BOB.
The lamest part of this discussion is not the fact that the Spit II is overmodeld, (which it is) It is that some on this thread think this is a great opportunity to talk out of their a$$ in terms of the performance differences of these aircraft and whether the Spit II should be part of this time frame (which it should). Hence the ONGOING SpitfireUFO vs. Luffiewiner argument continues.
How about just shut up and fly.
JD
AKA_MattE
|
Yeah here it goes again : the great gentlemen with the fine sense of history and impeccable sciences knowledge thinking that the glory of the past are their own property and insulting who the hell are not lined with their miserable wisdom.
Seems we have seen that alrdy
:
By the way "Superior" is not a term I wld hve use. That tells a lot...