Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonbirder
Falcon 4.0 Abandonware??? You'd better let everyone know then...particularly the Open Falcon and Red Viper Mod teams! Abandonware...Is it not the Most Active Forum on SimHQ after IL2? What is possible to Mod? Well apart from everything...FMs Weapons Parameters, Avionics, The Dynamic Campaign, Graphics, Cockpits, Enemy AI, Addition of a realistic Ramp Start sequence...apart from that...Not much!
Janes F/A18 was released in 2000, a whole year before IL2 which was released in 2001
CFS3...can anyone say that CFS3 hasn't been improved by the OFF and MAW Mods?
So in summary...your post to trash Flight Sims that have been actively modded by the community is flawed and you failed to post a single example of a Flight Simulation which has suffered from an active community and third party modification.
I'll let that speak for itself...
|
CFS may have been "improved" by mods into MAW, but that doesnt change the fact that MAW is a piece of garbage. (in my humble opinion that is)
And im not even comparing it to IL2, its a peice of garbage all by its own, propably because its based on CFS game engine more than anything else.
Everything is relativ. In those old sims u mention it doesnt take much to "improve" the game since its crap (or old) to begin with. If mods where to be approved by oleg in IL2 ill bet u a sack of money that a maximum of 5% would hold enough high standard to make the cut, the other 95% makes it into any of the above mantioned "good" modded sims.
Sry if im to rough in words, but u talk about all the other sims like they are alive and kicking, and expands due to mods when u are perfectly aware of that fact that thats not the case.
Remember offline is not the same as online. Online is what we are talking about, thats what all this is about.
Let me put it this way: Name one other online WWII combatflight sim that can be compared to IL2.