View Single Post
  #50  
Old 04-12-2011, 03:41 PM
Daniël's Avatar
Daniël Daniël is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 266
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike View Post
Would it be safe to consider that radar-guided AA guns don't have the same requirement for visual aiming aid as a manually aimed gun? I mean honestly, tracers are seriously un-tactical considering that they are a very visible give-away to any aircraft looking for action.

What I am saying is that tracers are a means of helping you aim, and if a gun is radar-guided there's not really a need for tracers unless you have to use the gun in "back-up" mode.

Also one can only assume that different manufacturers make different tracers with different burnlengths, colours and strength. So why is this Oerlikon footage "evidence" ?

And isn't this the same Oerlikon 35 millimeter gun you so kindly provided us footage of? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La9pk...800DADC3BB4E03

And then you have the allmighty Bofors (hats off for the swedes, though they are pacifists :p ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h_zgA7-sQg These tracer rounds seem to produce more light than conventional lightbulbs :p

I'm just saying the tracers in IL-2 CoD seem fine. And yes I've unloaded mag upon mag with only tracer rounds and I know what they look like. Night and day.
Second video: It's clearly visible that when the camera shakes the tracer appears wobbly. When the camera isn't shaking it's a laser. Most clear video to show this.
__________________

If you are insecure: use more bullets.
Reply With Quote