Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider
you have also quoted my reasons for disagreeing with your assessment.
|
ROFL. Here are my only quotes of you, since I posted my assessment and asked for your opposite reasoning:
"I'm going to have to disagree with your assessment, on the grounds of; I wait for fact concerning DCS and the SDK. Fact, not rumour, not assessment, not speculation, not Chinese whispers but fact."
"Are DCS still got their vendor (seller) independent (not under the control of any one, or group of, seller/s) underway yet? This is a fair question, I think... what do you think, Julian?"
If you have forgotten, the issue was (to quote you) "The question still remains though... was the (to be clearer) "vendor independant" SDK, developed purely by DCS without reference to or use of NP's SDK?"
I still think it's extremely unlikely that ED would try to use NP's software without permission. You still disagree, apparently with the reason: "just because".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider
DCS, Julian, only ever (at least in going by the link) mentioned 3DoF, may I ask you; where did the 6DoF come into it from?
|
The ED quote implies that more than 3DoF was originally intended, and as 6DoF is the current standard, and also the number of DoF required for fully featured human head movement, it's a safe deduction to make.
Anyway, if you're not going to discuss the issue, but rather write circuitous and irrelevant questions, I'll leave you to it.