Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
Where? He presented false and incomplete information about source variables without understanding what they mean. All of this flavored with wild accusations.
|
So do you call me a "liar" now? At first you said that things like the Sniper ShVAKs 20mm gunner in Pe8 is "not a big problem" and you did not deny the meaning of the "delta angle" error. So, if does not indicate the Accuracy (dispersion) of the gun, please enlighten us, oh wise one, please. We are 'imbeciles" so we rely on your wisdom. Please, what does the "angle error" mean?
And for bombs you said that it is the way they are, so you confirmed the data are correct. But now you come here and accuse me of being a "liar". Please, oh wise one, enlighten us what these parameters mean? Please do, since we are so ignorant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
No matter how fishy they look (and some of them do look fishy) what matters is ingame performance (test), comparison to historical evidence and game limitations.
|
So, despite they "look" "fishy" they are "correct". And then, how come and in the 2001 Original IL2 release these values Did NOT look "fishy" ?
could you explain please? Since you are the wisdom-holder.
Moreover people DO confirm these largely false data. They can "FEEL" them but they have not the data to support their feeling. Now they have.
Could you also explain to us ignorants, the meaning of the Bomb values i posted? Please?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
We collect historical references on subjects we think might be wrong on our own.
|
Really? So, where are Your Historical sources for the pylons you made to weight 15 kilos? Can we see your "Sources" please?
Can we also see your sources that start the mentone bomb and rocket pylons to have Zero weight?
Moreover can you show us your "sources" that justify the Double-Penetration value of some Weapons? Lets say the ShKAS over the .303 Brownings. can we see that please?
Also, can we see your sources that proove the data from the 2001 release about Bombs as FALSE while the current game data be regarded as corrrect?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
If you want to see some issue addressed sooner, it is by far the easiest way for us if you perform ingame tests and provide historical documents. We don't care who provides those data if everything is reliable.
|
Please, as i wrote above: can we see your data about the 15 Kgs pylons and for the Zero-Weight pylons also? Also about the guns, Bombs, etc....
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
That's the normal procedure for any "Bug report" for any game.
If you don't want to help, the issue goes at the end of the cue.
|
Many people have informed you for the many bugs that this game suffers, but you did nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
Now, you tell me how you want us to respond when someone comes along and says "something looks fishy, fix it!"?
|
It does not only "looks" fishy, it FEELS "fishy", it IS Wrong! Like the overheating issues, the extraordinary destructiveness of Certain Bombs, Weapons, etc...
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroWave
Our experience is that in 90% of cases such claims are false.
|
With such an attitude, i am not surprised
