Quote:
Originally Posted by Hood
There's nothing wrong with DRM if it means that the developers get paid the money they should receive. Yes its inconvenient for us, and yes it means those with dial up may suffer, and yes it means that some won't buy the game. The flip side is that the developers get paid and they keep producing great games for the majority us to play.
Don't forget that DRM is only a response to software piracy and without one the other wouldn't be needed. Not everyone is a software pirate but everyone has the potential to be one, and DRM removes the temptation.
If you won't buy a game because of DRM then that is your choice and of course you're entitled to follow that course of action. I think you'll be left behind though. I'm just hoping that if DRM is implemented that it isn't done so in an obstructive way.
Hood
|
What a silly post. If the majoraty of gamers would think like this, we wouldn't have any privacy at all any more. You seem to have no personal opinion, you just nod in agreement like these nodding dogs to every sh*t the publisher pretends to be necessary.
It's not only that DRM causes a permanent internet connection to the publisher (who knows what private data they read out and use for their statistics and other) and as you can see, game servers are switched off already after a year or two.
Imagine this happens with SoW.
And, why is it the publishers decision when I will be able to play a game? It's my right to play it when I want to and where I want to.