Thread: Nuklear bomb
View Single Post
  #218  
Old 09-01-2010, 08:48 PM
Madfish Madfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xilon_x View Post
il-2 have only conventional army but in realty in ww2 american use illegal army EXAMPLE mustard gas BOMBs yes i remember
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Raid_on_Bari

i not see the difference from 100.000.000 convetional bombs and one 1 nuke bomb the difference is the quantity.

WE must also admit that to build one nuclear bomb it took a lot of money scientists and plutonium.
difficulties' huge during ww2.
Yes, you are right about that. Well, the bombs weren't used in this case but think of Dresden etcetera. The allieds have a very dark history of developing absurd weapons of terror and using them. In this case at least preparing them.

But although you are right it is still a difference if you use them against civillians or a military target. So should we, like it was done in real life, simulate concentration camps and use atomic bombs or chemical weapons now? I'm not so sure about that.

I do understand your point, and being German I might even go so far and say: yes, show the truth and don't hide the wrongdoings of the allieds under mist. But then again, sometimes a hero can be born out of evil and I believe in this case it's better to just keep silent to prevent aviation sims from suffering under such absurdly unethical weapons.

What's your oppinion?


[EDIT]
And by the way, the attack on Bari is interesting. It could be campaign material even but it appears that no German intel on the mustard gas bombs existed so I guess it wouldn't make much sense after all.

Last edited by Madfish; 09-01-2010 at 08:51 PM.
Reply With Quote