So you've not found a source that confirms your delusional pseudo-physics then, Gaston? All you've done is repeat the same old nonsense.
JtD has already responded to David603's comment here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...2&postcount=30. I see no need to repeat a perfectly clear explanation of why he is incorrect. A response which as usual you ignored because you don't understand it.
As for fighters having pulleys, this is the context in which you mentioned them:
Quote:
|
The wing's leading edge higher position acts in effect as a "power assist" to defeat the thrust force of the propeller, allowing the angrily pulling forward prop to be tilted back ever so slightly, so the pilot is not pulling back on the prop directly with his own muscle because the wing's increasing load is helping him by taking up the load, and in addition he has the 18 foot lever, with pulley assistance, to help initiate the tilt....
|
Since you referred to 'pulley assistance' in creating a force, I assumed you meant that this 'pulley' was attached to something. Since all you claim now to be referring to is part of the control system, perhaps you'd care to explain what the heck it has to do with increasing the wing loading? On second thoughts, don't bother. I'm not the slightest bit interested in reading any more of your crackpot fantasy physics.
Case closed.