Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikitns
T29 has awesome frontal armour and a huge and very strong gun.
|
Never noticed that. All in all the Tiger II usualy the better tank it will probably go out 8 of 10 engagements against the T29 at least as winner. Maybe for a "usual" vehicle the T29 has very strong armor but in game the Pak43 has not much trouble to punch trough it while on the other side the T29 has serious issues with the front armor of the Tiger II or anything with similar armor values (Jagdtiger). Thus the reason why I dont understand the huge price for the T29 when anything on the german side is cheaper.
When I have a Tiger II on the field and I see the T29 approaching I am quite happy. Cause I know that its not much of a match and when its loost the enemy had to spend a lot of points on it. Maybe, but just maybe the T29 is a good shell magnet. In other words keeping the enemy bussy on long range. But as soon you get to some distance where you can hit the enemy the Tiger II gun will right punch trough the front armor. Seen that happen so many times. The tourtle on the other side is a much better vehicle. But its a chassis without turret. Those are usualy easy to destroy once you killed their tracks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikitns
Sturmtiger takes an eternity to reload, and it often misses (you need to have a very close hit to an IS3 to tip it over). Though yeah, the way it can tip over heavy tanks is just annoying.
PS. Nice pictures
|
Its good enough protected to get close to score a clear hit from 2 or 3 shoots. And thats more then you can say about the IS152 for example which without cover can be destroyed quite often by the heavy tanks. So the Axis do not only have the advantage of reliable armor which can stop the armor of the enemy but also somewhat a huge artillery which helps a lot to overcome those situations where no side can advance without taking huge risks.
Maybe for the Katyusha and Maultier Rocketluncher the realistic reload animation would not mean much as those vehicles are anyway quite vulnerable. But regarding the Sturmtiger and Caliope it would mean ALOT! imagine as you try to reload those vehicles but the enemy has some knowledge about their position shelling it with artillery. Now you are loosing 2 of its crew members reloading the vehicle and you cant continue to reload before the vehicle has not its full crew. And if you move the units around you cant reload them. THis would give people which use artillery like the Caliope or Sturmtiger some preasure and make them a bit more even to the Katyusha and mobile German rocketluncher.
But I think anyway that just from the diversity of units the Germans are the top notch. They pretty much have for every situation the correct answer. With the Panzer III and Puma as best light vehicles. The Panther, Tiger, Stug, Jagdpanzer IV as average counter to medium armor and their choice in artillery is awesome with the Sig33, Hummel and Sfh18 not to mention the heavy tanks and mobile rocket luncher. At this point I have to ask my self where are the Sexton and Priest self propeled artilley on the US and British side ? What about the Comet tank (comparable with the Tiger I) which saw at least more use then the Centurion! Seroiusly I am quite tired from playing with brits fighting eventualy Panthers and other armor with the Achiles and Firefly which are really no match for the Panther. The Comet would give here at least a bit more diverstiy and fairness. Playing with the Brits is hard enough anyway but sometimes its ridiculous.
British Sexton
US M7 Armored Artillery
Comet heavy tank
