Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanner
You are delusional if you don't think that Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II will be far better in quality than BoB. Both games have the backing of major games publishers with far more dollars, development staff, and technological advancements and developments than some minor independent Russian developer. We are talking about BioWare and Blizzard here. They both have more money and more experience than Maddox games will ever have.
When Martin Sheen starts doing voice work for SOW, you might be able to make such an argument as quality over quantity, but as the score stands now you can fully expect Mass Effect 2 and Starcraft II to win in both those categories.
You wanna support the minor flight sim genre? Go buy some. Voting on some online poll don't mean a thing.
|
Wow, great logic. More dollars plus hollywood voice actors = higher quality.
Comparing quality btw a RTS, a 3rd person shooter and a WWII flight sim is silly in itself too. No one is delusional voting for SOW. The track record of the developer delivering one of the greatest flight sims of all time is reason enough for SOW to be a voting option.
You also fail considering another sim that came out right after IL2 with far more money and resources completely failed to deliver a sim anywhere close to IL2's quality.
Also, the developers behind Starcraft II and Mass Effect 2 couldn't deliver a sim as good as the nearly 10 year old IL2 if they decided to develop one. They don't have the knowledge and resources needed to make an accurate WWII simulator.
They could make a WWII
GAME, but not a simulator that could compete with the detail, accuracy, and realism that Maddox games will achieve. It's already proven by other developers trying to compete with far more money and resources and failing big time.