![]() |
http://bobgamehub.blogspot.dk/p/clif...er-review.html
"In my original review I wrote "Like a good wine, Cliffs of Dover can be played now, and it should get better with age." A year later, I can no longer say that, because so little has been done to improve the game's performance faults, and nothing has been done to add or fix the lack of gameplay content or AI for single player enthusiasts. Rather, I would now say, you will get your money's worth if you buy it on special (which it frequently is) at a bargain price between 5USD or 10USD. See if it works for you, on your PC. And if it does, you will then have the money to spend on the Desastersoft campaign download, which adds the game which the developers left out." |
Quote:
Yes, the prices are very good now. |
Quote:
BTW, I get CTD every other mission since beta patch, not before. True for some not for others I guess. 60:40 as the poll shows. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And this is the way 1C has said the plan on doing it with CoD.. It work well for IL-2 so I don't see any reason why they would change thier way of doing thing.. Long story short You would be hard pressed to find anyone still playing the orginal 1.0 version of IL-2, and if they are and thus refuse to buy 1946, well that says more about them than it does 1C IMHO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It appears the performance/stability patch has been relatively successful, as the poll suggests that 95% of those in the poll rarely have a CTD. If thats true, the development should be able to move forward, and concentrate mainly on the game play issues. This is good news as the development would have definitely shut down if it was not successful.
Personally I've never experienced a CTD, but the sim still isn't good enough to keep my interest up. Gameplay issues are now the most critical aspect, and most of these issues must be addressed before the release of the Sequel, or again the development will not survive. |
Quote:
The poll was problematic as its choices were skewed. I had to vote all the time when it was not really accurate because rarely was even less accurate. Some may have had CTD's 50% of the time and voted rarely because all the time and never were less appropriate. But it appears 40% are still getting crashes. But yes if the stability is truly fixed for most then things could get better. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.