Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   A Question for my fellow COD lovers (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32943)

JG52Krupi 07-02-2012 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PotNoodles (Post 440381)
I suppose it depends on what you mean by working. In one post you say it's working for you and in the other you mention bugs that some people would say was not a working game. I would say any game with a Launcher exe crash was not a working game because at times it is not working when it should.

If your getting a bug exiting a game I would say that while its annoying would it really hinder you playing the game!

http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/...hphrases-2.jpg

GOA_Potenz 07-02-2012 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winny (Post 440170)
+1

Take note of this post.

It's the one simple truth of the whole sequel saga..

In short.
If COD doesn't work neither will BOM. Which also means that if BOM works, so will COD..

I'm amazed at how many of the 'outraged by the sequel' posters have forgotten or ignored this basic point.

The problem lays when in the case that BoM works you will have to buy it to make CloD works too, and if that could be the case, it will be plain fraud

Bob_Marley 07-02-2012 01:32 AM

Will you be able to fly though trees and building aswell in BOM?. And also will there be a demo of BOM? so we can try before we buy cus i wouldnt want to make the same mistake again.

JG52Krupi 07-02-2012 01:34 AM

Buildings! I never have been able to fly directly through a buildings only trees :(

PotNoodles 07-02-2012 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi (Post 440383)
If your getting a bug exiting a game I would say that while its annoying would it really hinder you playing the game!

http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/...hphrases-2.jpg

It may not hinder you but nobody can describe this as a working game, if they do describe it as a working game then they should also agree it's not a working game when it crashes. There are two sides to the argument here and no one side is right, it depends how you look at it.

*Buzzsaw* 07-02-2012 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madfish (Post 439738)
The focus HAS to be the sequel since CloD isn't selling anymore.

The reason it isn't selling is because they did a Cr*p job on it, not because there isn't a community. The original IL-2 continued to sell even after FORGOTTEN BATTLES came out because it was a GOOD game. CoD is a lousy game that's why it doesn't sell.

And to compound the error and build a sequel on top of the current trainwreck is no way to solve the financial problems the company is having. Yeah they might get a few one off sales to start, but if the problems which plague CoD are present in BoM, then its future isn't going to be any brighter.

It would have cost them a lot less to get down and actually fix the problems in CoD instead of devoting all their time to building a new Sim. Instead they allocated the major portion of their resources to building new aircraft, maps and objects, all of which are going to be operating in the same poorly coded game enviroment.

How stupid do they think the community is? Do they think we will continue to buy half finished games on the promise we will have a different cockpit to sit in, while neglecting to mention yeah, different cockpit, same old issues?

Sorry, don't see this as a viable business plan, and I don't plan to be a subscriber.

Bob_Marley 07-02-2012 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* (Post 440415)
The reason it isn't selling is because they did a Cr*p job on it, not because there isn't a community. The original IL-2 continued to sell even after FORGOTTEN BATTLES came out because it was a GOOD game. CoD is a lousy game that's why it doesn't sell.

And to compound the error and build a sequel on top of the current trainwreck is no way to solve the financial problems the company is having. Yeah they might get a few one off sales to start, but if the problems which plague CoD are present in BoM, then its future isn't going to be any brighter.

It would have cost them a lot less to get down and actually fix the problems in CoD instead of devoting all their time to building a new Sim. Instead they allocated the major portion of their resources to building new aircraft, maps and objects, all of which are going to be operating in the same poorly coded game enviroment.

How stupid do they think the community is? Do they think we will continue to buy half finished games on the promise we will have a different cockpit to sit in, while neglecting to mention yeah, different cockpit, same old issues?

Sorry, don't see this as a viable business plan, and I don't plan to be a subscriber.

+1

Wolf_Rider 07-02-2012 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* (Post 440415)

How stupid do they think the community is? Do they think we will continue to buy half finished games on the promise we will have a different cockpit to sit in, while neglecting to mention yeah, different cockpit, same old issues?



An outsider reading through the forums would have little choice but to consider that for the most (but not all, are rather....

JG52Krupi 07-02-2012 07:46 AM

The thing you don't seem to be getting is that they are fully aware that if cod doesn't get fixed very few ppl will bother with whatever they produce, we know this they know this the next instalment has to be compatible with Cod so do ppl really think they are taking fixing this game lightly?

Wolf_Rider 07-02-2012 07:55 AM

Well, with the amount of whining, crying, tiny foot stamping going on, combined with utter outrage because (for instance) the clouds aren't puffy enough... I could really understand it if they'd be putting alot of effort into just messing with peoples' heads


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.