Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   The unfortunate turth (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31817)

Opitz 05-07-2012 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 420998)
Guys, if you read the patch notes the purpose of this alpha-release is not to make our flying more comfortable or enjoyable but to collect crash-logs and crash-dump files. CTDs of different nature (and specific to user hardware) are hunted and fixed one-by-one as goes from naryv's comment @sukhoi.ru I refer to here http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=31835

They reworked the core of the engine (multi-threading, etc.) that took probably 4-5 months and only now they will start fixing bugs with our feedback. Disappointing ATM because of a long wait but still very promising.

Send crash-reports and logs, post issues at bugtracker and vote for them. It will take time to fix them but the progress is visible if you read the link above.

now I've got it.... we talk about BETA PATCH all the time, just this release was ALPHA version of future BETA PATCH!!!

finally understood... thanks, mate!

Mysticpuma 05-07-2012 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 420994)


Wow, that really is a big difference. The textures are very soft in comparison!

I'm just checking out the on the lettering on the dials and also the top of the control column. That's a big difference in definition!

It seems that to increase the frame-rate they have decided to remove all the beauty, like clouds, grass, textures....so removing 50% of the items it came with should increase the frame-rate by 50%?

Not the best way of fixing it surely?

MP

(Still living in hope!)

150GCT_Veltro 05-07-2012 11:27 AM

I've myself a positive and constructive feedback after this patch. We are not so stupid Luthier, you can jokes us in this bad way. Give it up guys......

You're working on Moscow, period. CoD has ben dropped, or cancelled in your minds.

This would be more honest than persist to provide us this shame. After 13 months, what you guys have show us now doesn't have anymore any sort of explanations and/or excuses.

Good luck for Moscow.

SNAFU 05-07-2012 11:30 AM

Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate! :evil: .... ;)

Ataros 05-07-2012 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 150GCT_Veltro (Post 421005)
I've myself a positive and constructive feedback after this patch. We are not so stupid Luthier, you can jokes us in this bad way. Give it up guys......

You're working on Moscow, period. CoD has ben dropped, or cancelled in your minds.

This would be more honest than persist to provide us this shame. After 13 months, what you guys have show us now doesn't have anymore any sort of explanations and/or excuses.

Good luck for Moscow.

CloD engine = BoM engine

Ataros 05-07-2012 11:48 AM

Please vote to get high-res cockpits back here http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/246

fruitbat 05-07-2012 11:51 AM

voted.

PotNoodles 05-07-2012 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carguy_ (Post 420942)
Last time I read there was a vocal minority here that wanted the patch, even the alpha version of it. They got it allright. They found another reasons to complain too.
.

They have found many reasons to complain because they have been told week in and week out what has supposed to of been fixed in terms of bugs. Just before the release of the patch Blacksix, reported a small list of bugs that still remained. However, we still got exited just to read that the FPS had double for most Pc's and that the CTD had almost been eliminated. Now all of a sudden we find we are beta/alpha testers again because the Devs have handed use a patch that hasn't really fixed the CTD, or doubled Fps. Please don't tell me it's because of a vocal minority they released the patch when it was only the other week that Blacksix said they wouldn't release a patch until it did what it said on the tin. They have released it because they realize now they need more testers to find the bugs, it's nothing to do with anyone demanding the patch. Maybe they should have released it sooner and they would have had the bug report quicker if anything.

Many weeks of thinking this is getting fixed and that is getting fix, judging by the reports coming out. Then we find out these things are the same and even worse for many when the patch finally arrives. I wonder why people moan I really do.

Buchon 05-07-2012 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 420994)

This post would be more useful in the bugs thread than in a Trolling thread fruitbat. ;-)



BTW, for the "audience", they did not remove the textures to improve the performance, how this can even be true if the textures are there in the 70 FOV view ?

The textures still there even in the 90 FOV, if you use the offset button and move forward the mouse they will be visible :

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/7708/534s.jpg

The problem its just that the range of the new texture manager is to short in cockpit view while you are using the 90 FOV.

This make me wonder even if our "beloved audience" have played the game or just go here to throw his "invaluable comments".

fruitbat 05-07-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buchon (Post 421050)
This post would be more useful in the bugs thread than in a Trolling thread fruitbat. ;-)



Done Buchon;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.