![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I LOVE seaplanes :-P Pure fun! That Emily would make an awesome bass boat.
|
Quote:
Gotta love the Catalina though :grin: |
Quote:
Catalina wouldn't be a bad plane, just to fly around in. (Doesn't even have to be war time, just flying around the Pacific and Atlantic etc. would be so much fun in one of them.) |
Quote:
thats pretty much all i do in the catalina anyway lol just fly land fly land fly land. its just so fun landing on water ;) |
|
Stranraer?
|
Yes
|
Sweet!! wouldnt of known that really to be honest but your mention of supermarine previously gave me a clue :D
|
w-w-w-win
|
|
t38 talon ?
|
T45 Goshawk?
|
Quote:
Edit: Ah, well done Foz you got it. |
ugly plane... ^^
|
very similair to the BAE Hawk, so quite easy to spot :D
|
Quote:
Stinger, I Certainly wouldn't call the Hawk ugly. Ok I will find another plane to post because foz doesn't want to. http://i45.tinypic.com/eqa0yr.jpg |
Looks like a prowler...
but surely cant be, not with it doing mid air refuelling |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Lets look into the future with this one. http://i46.tinypic.com/2yljpmp.jpg |
KA-6D is the one passing the gas. Some other A-6 topping off.
|
Quote:
________ SUZUKI GSX250FX SPECIFICATIONS |
Quote:
|
Quote:
not really-they're still pinching everyone else's ideas...just a little less blatant than the Chinese ________ MERCEDES-BENZ W187 SPECIFICATIONS |
What was "pinched" with the zero?
|
|
So the H-1 racer had a 2,000 mile range, 3100 fpm climb and could shoot down any allied fighter in existance until 1943?
I love the H-1, gorgeous airplane, but it's not a fighter. To say that the Zero (or the FW190) had anything more than a superficial resemblance to it is unjustified. Might as well claim that any metal airplane with flush rivets is also a copy of the H1. Here's a link y'all might dig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKqLe...eature=related |
Sounded nice.... couldn't actually see it once it took off though! haha. Looked dog ugly though :(
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
not every copied design has the exact same performance....:rolleyes:
it wouldn't have been the first fighter based on a racer design around that time, although countries tended to base the fighters on racers designed in their own country e.g. spits and macchis Its a well known part of Japanese ingenuity to make the best use of derivative design...they do it better than anyone. Just ask any mx5 or lexus owner.... ________ Vaporizer Review |
Wasn't the H1, just one of Howard Hughes racers from the 30s that he crashed in or something? It was in LA in fact, that he crashed. Anyway, I don't think it could have been fitted to be a fighter, would have had to overhaul it, and such.
And Macchi was a racer before WW2, and than was told to start making fighters for Italy. They still do make some sea plane racers I think? |
Quote:
I'm not saying the racers were fitted as fighters, but racers largely influenced the fighters in a number of cases... ________ BMW VI HISTORY |
I think virtually all of the great piston engined fighters were influenced by 1930's air racers, why not accuse them all of "pinching"? To claim that the Japanese simply "pinch" other designs is an extremely simplistic viewpoint and ignores a great engineering accomplishment. Very few modern aircraft can perform as well as the Zero on as little fuel. Give 'em a little credit why don't ya? :P
|
I've already used words like "ingenuity"...and alot of the zeros performance was due to it lacking pretty much any safety equipment or luxury items (like radios) which pilots/ground crew would strip out post build to keep the weight down.
If credit is due its the pilots that fought in them. Great plane but bit of a death trap... ________ BUY VAPOLUTION |
Quote:
You also have not produced any evidence to indicate that the similarities between the Zero and the H1 were anything more than superficial. Clearly the Japanese were impressed by the H1. So was Kurt Tank. So what? Ok, so maybe I'm getting a bit too defensive here. Point is I would LOVE to own a Zero as a peacetime toy. I would have to modify the cockpit some to get my 6'5" American sized body to fit, but what fun! And as efficient as the Zero was, I could even afford the gas bill :P |
Quote:
|
And what about the Russians? Look at your picture Soviet, it's a fast airplane with a round engine! No way the inferior Soviet engineers could have come up with that on there own. They must have copied Howard Hughes!
|
Quote:
|
funny- I didn't even mention the engine...start with the tail empennage, the wing planiform similarities...
nevermind, you've made your mind up already... now as I believe it's my turn to set a plane pic to be identified you can jolly well shut up and pay attention :grin: ________ Chang'An Ford Mazda Engine Specifications |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
interesting answer cos I always thought there was a passing resemblance....(possible pedantry in 3,2,1....) ________ WEED |
Quote:
|
Quote:
________ Honda Civic (Fifth Generation) |
Quote:
Bet its wrong |
|
damn, ahhh well, i would keep guessing but i gotta go out :(
|
|
|
Ok im back from town, now lets see if i can get this one right. (Feel compelled to do so)
Gonna copy the image into a photo editing software to see if i can see it a little more clearly, Then its Mine ;) |
Quote:
if so the hallifax? |
Pics really tiny (or is it just me being dumb?) but it looks live an avro shackleton.
|
Quote:
Ive just spent about half hour cleaning the image up to see it better and Just came back to see you had beaten me to it! ah well Its a good job i like you ;) |
Quote:
Just for you though.... i'll let you take credit and post the next pic ;) lol |
Quote:
At first i glanced at it and immediately saw the twin tail and thought B-24. While i was out i was thinking it was one of the Avro series but just kept thinking i cant be that obvious. Theres always next time ;) Now i just gotta get yours correct and im done :grin: |
Hmmm...
Ok im not to good at this so will make it a fairly easy one just for you spitfire :D lol. Unless someone gets it before you haha. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...1983/PLANE.jpg |
Quote:
That would be the Hawker P1040 (Prototype) :grin: |
yup :D
told you it would be nice and easy lol. Ok try this one, equally as easy - http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...otherplane.jpg |
Quote:
|
Yup :D
At first glance you would think its a spitfire. But then when you look closely you can see a few little things that are slightly different. |
Quote:
|
|
No idea mate :(
Looks like the osprey. Maybe a prototype? |
Quote:
|
xc-142?
|
Quote:
|
took a while :( i had to play on the Osprey approach and take it from their and see where it lead me. Wasn't easy. Modern jets/helicopters really are not my thing haha. They just sound loud and boring (except the huey) i love the sound of a merlin or griffon.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
lol |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Foz would probably love the sound of this one, even though it's obviously not a Merlin :grin:
I'll post 2 pics just because it's so purty |
No tries yet? Ok, here's a hint: Think "water cooled homebuilt". Still nothing? Think "Oldsmobile V-8 powered homebuilt". If that still doesn't work, try "worlds best looking and meanest sounding Oldsmobile V8 powered homebuilt" :-P
|
|
Quote:
|
Correct, not sure about the camera plane, think its a vulcan from the window shape though
|
Quote:
Try this:https://www.fiddlersgreen.net/aircra...f85-goblin.jpg And this :evil: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/...aea0b8.jpg?v=0 |
Pogo?
|
Quote:
|
Goblin "parasite" fighter
I think the biplane is a Grumman FF-1 |
well the byplane looks like an americonised i153
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
With the way the engine is placed, and the body all together; I'd have to agree with Flynlion that it's a Grumman FF-1 Biplane. If not, then it's got to be a F2F-1 or 2, but the engine isn't fitted right to be either of those.
It's definitely American, because I don't know of any British biplane that was made for the US Navy in the late 20s early 30s. :P EDIT: And I think those are actually Canadians checking it out? They apparently did use them for a time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So am I the only one on the forum who likes homebuilts? Nobody wants to try a guess at my pics? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So I've stumped the Foz and P-51? Then my work here is done.....
It's called the Jaguar, by Prowler Aviation. I first saw (and HEARD!) one fly at the Oshkosh fly-in many years ago and have wanted one ever since. Check out their website: http://www.prowleraviation.com/ I love homebuilts. Military stuff is fine but anyone can build a nice airplane if they spend enough money. Homebuilts are made on a limited budget with craftsmanship, dedication and LOVE. Guess I shouldn't give the Prowler people too much credit since they obviously pinched their ideas from the Spit, Mustang and a dozen other warbirds from the 40's (sorry Juz1 I couldn't resist). Who wants to post our next plane? |
|
Thats got to be a P38 Lightning??
flynlion.... nice info! takes alot of dedication and time and effort and not to mention money to build such a thing. Im sure if someone offered me a flight in one i wouldnt say no ;) |
yes, a p38...
your turn. |
Quote:
Im no good at posting the pics, i just like guessing :D someone else can post again. |
Quote:
|
http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz16/FOZ1983/ybw.jpg
Sorry guys, i just had to do!! :D What is it? lol. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.