No sense in the nonsense - we have an ignore list tool

Click on User CP and scroll down abit.

You can always change it, if you like.

It's a real help sometimes when you just can't get along with someone.

:rolleyes:

Maybe, for users with powerful machines this little update from tueday had an infinitesimal difference, while for users with modest machines it has made a more noticeable increase in performance. I'm sure that guy with 4 gtx580 didn't notice any improvement.

And..

So, just to be clear..

based on cheesehawk's responce, it is safe to assume that he has answered YES to both of the following questions

1. (Y/N) Does it make sense to have members of your software team developing a patch to fix 'video A', and at the same time have your software team developing a patch that is going to replace 'video A' with 'video B' just days later?
   
2. (Y/N) Does it make sense to have members of your software team develop and release a patch that does not change the version number?

Fact?

Interesting..

So let me see if I understand you correctly..

Your saying that up to now, the STEAM software has been causing CoD to stutter and run 10fps slower than it should..

So far so good?


And that we are to belive


(1) 1C did NOT notice CoD shuddering and running 10fps slower via STEAM than without STEAM.

OR

(2) 1C did notice CoD shuddering and running 10fps slower via STEAM, but did not say anything about it before the patch, let alone say anything after the patch.

Which is it?

Either one just seems odd to me.. but that is your opinion and your welcome to it! I just hope your open minded enough to 'allow' others to express their opinions, and even disagree with yours.. Without you having to continue to resort to personal attacks.

No, I'll not allow others to express their opinions if this opinion is:

"The game don't runs better now in your computer".

Because THIS is "personal attack" and plain stupidity and lack of respect.

Ok?

Well than I guess it is a good thing that no one has said the game does not run better now on your computer

Based on your responce I don't think you fully understand what 'personal attack' means?

If you would like, I can proivde you some examples from your previous post to me and others that IMHO qualify as 'personal attacks'.

Let me know if you think that would help, in that I would be glad to do that for you!

C'mon guys. Lets bring this dead horse to page 10. :-D

Maybe it is just me..

But I always thought the purpose of a forum was to provide the user a place to exchange information and ideas..

Right?

Assuming that is the case..

I don't think anyone should expect their claims of FACT on any subject to be the last word on the subject..

Right?

I mean if your going to come into a forum (as define by me above) shouldn't it be expected that others may be prone to ask questions wrt to the statements of FACT this or FACT that?

Right?

So, knowing in advance one should expect questions as to how they came to their conclusions of FACT. I think they should not post at all if they are going to be so offended by questions that they have to resort to personal attacks

Am I crazy to expect that? Is that too much to ask?

Valid questions ACE-OF-ACES.
I think the new "disagree with me and you're my enemy for life" of Internet-laws has some inmpact on the issue.
:)

Very common in here.