Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   FAQ-QUESTIONS,release date,system specs, for CoD (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=16401)

Hecke 01-12-2011 07:39 PM

True true.
But new era needs new name. It would have been perfect to write on the package that it's from the makers of IL-2.
But taking the old name.
Oleg said himself that they want to make newbies also from other genres to buy the game.

When new people who haven't played IL-2 hear the name, they will maybe look in the internet and find out (by mistake) that the game engine is from 2000 or so.
Goodbye big sales.

kristorf 01-12-2011 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 211388)
Ubisoft - OMG (not Oleg Maddox Games)
I thought it was hot in britain?!

Not for the last couple of months mate........

SlipBall 01-12-2011 08:15 PM

Nice looking kit...where's the 109 manual:-P'


http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...1541291588.jpg

ElAurens 01-12-2011 09:56 PM

:cool:

This is so very exciting.

*Off to pre-order*

JG4_Helofly 01-12-2011 10:03 PM

Why is there always a burning axis plane on the cover?
In FB it was a burning stuka, PF it was a burning zero and now it seems to be a burning heinkel bomber ;)

ElAurens 01-12-2011 10:06 PM

Umm, because they lost perhaps?

Just a wild guess mind you.


:rolleyes:

Insuber 01-12-2011 11:14 PM

Finally the DVD cover artwork ... it looks credible. The end March release date is not quite credible, though ...

Thx for posting this finding.

Cheers,
Insuber

el0375 01-13-2011 12:02 AM

great artwork but due do ubisoft and due to drm all those years of waiting might come to a dissapointment. do not that 1c has the major responsability but i might gice it at least a 25%

swiss 01-13-2011 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el0375 (Post 211497)
great artwork but due do ubisoft and due to drm all those years of waiting might come to a dissapointment. do not that 1c has the major responsability but i might gice it at least a 25%

You didn't really expect it to come without any kind of DRM at all, did you?

el0375 01-13-2011 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss (Post 211509)
You didn't really expect it to come without any kind of DRM at all, did you?

offcourse i expect protection
lets say that the DRM it was my worst case scenario

swiss 01-13-2011 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el0375 (Post 211512)
offcourse i expect protection
lets say that the DRM it was my worst case scenario

What kind of protection did you expect/hope for?

I mean, wtf? Online activation is soooo ok - if it stays at that.

WTE_Galway 01-13-2011 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG4_Helofly (Post 211459)
Why is there always a burning axis plane on the cover?
In FB it was a burning stuka, PF it was a burning zero and now it seems to be a burning heinkel bomber ;)

Its a 109 burning from a very unusual spot on the wing around the position of the wheel well and cannon. Well away from any fuel tanks.

LukeFF 01-13-2011 02:06 AM

Great, now we can nitpick the box art to death. :roll:

WTE_Galway 01-13-2011 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeFF (Post 211528)
Great, now we can nitpick the box art to death. :roll:

well we don't want to mislead new players into shooting at the wrong spot :D

swiss 01-13-2011 02:17 AM

Thank lord there are no clouds on the cover.

Skoshi Tiger 01-13-2011 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElAurens (Post 211460)
Umm, because they lost perhaps?

Just a wild guess mind you.


:rolleyes:

Oh! No wonder my entry in the recent 'BOB Box Art Contest' didn't get to the finals! I had A striking image of victorious Japanese troops frog marching past Nelsons column with waves of Ar-234's in the background. Quite stiring I though!

;)

ElAurens 01-13-2011 03:41 AM

:grin:

Sutts 01-13-2011 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlipBall (Post 211419)
Nice looking kit...where's the 109 manual:-P'


http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...1541291588.jpg

Is that an official photo SlipBall? Couldn't find it on the link supplied.

If it is then the inclusion of an original Spitfire manual shows real confidence in the accuracy of the sim's systems and operating parameters.

DoorGunner 01-13-2011 10:49 AM

here you can find more infos: http://www.gbase.ch/PC/news/IL-2---C...992/47724.html

What surprises me is this fact (same link):

+In the solo campaign, you will sent into battle as a Royal Air Force pilot.

So, no German solo campaign?

SlipBall 01-13-2011 10:50 AM

quote
Is that an official photo SlipBall?


I found it here
http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...ml#Post3177736
but it seems to be widespread at the pre-order sites:grin:

Sutts 01-13-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlipBall (Post 211623)
quote
Is that an official photo SlipBall?


I found it here
http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...ml#Post3177736
but it seems to be widespread at the pre-order sites:grin:

Thanks Slipball, it does look impressive. Hope Oleg would get the extra if we go for the collectors edition. Can't stand the thought of the publisher making more than the developer after the years of blood and sweat that Oleg has put into this.

el0375 01-13-2011 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss (Post 211513)
What kind of protection did you expect/hope for?

I mean, wtf? Online activation is soooo ok - if it stays at that.

onlne activation ok, but ubisoft last year launched constabnt onlien connection and becasue of that im worried, i do not want to think how people might interpret what is written in teh box..sorry enlgish not native language

Insuber 01-13-2011 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el0375 (Post 211735)
onlne activation ok, but ubisoft last year launched constabnt onlien connection and becasue of that im worried, i do not want to think how people might interpret what is written in teh box..sorry enlgish not native language


Constant online is very unlikely; one-time online activation is acceptable to most people.
(Funny thing: your grammar looks OK ... but plenty of typos, easily solvable with the automatic spelling check ... mmmmhhhh ....)

Chivas 01-13-2011 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 211837)
OMG

Oleg you lost your last principles!

It is the beginning of the end.

Ubisoft as publisher and required Internet connection, that are those things you promised, that will never happens in your games.

All this makes me very sad.

I believe the internet connection is just for initial activation, but I could care less as my computer is always on-line thru cable connection anyway.

I'm in favor of anyway they can protect their investmest as thats in my best interests aswell.

Hecke 01-13-2011 08:17 PM

That's nice for you,

but other people don't have permanent internet connection and some have a very unstable or slow connection.
It's ignorant to pretend there weren't any problems.

Chivas 01-13-2011 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 211844)
That's nice for you,

but other people don't have permanent internet connection and some have a very unstable or slow connection.
It's ignorant to pretend there weren't any problems.

Did I say anywhere that there weren't internet problems although I doubt they are as bad as some people might suggest.

Dano 01-13-2011 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 211837)
OMG

Oleg you lost your last principles!

It is the beginning of the end.

Ubisoft as publisher and required Internet connection, that are those things you promised, that will never happens in your games.

All this makes me very sad.

What and where did Oleg promise?

Tvrdi 01-13-2011 09:15 PM

just like in ROF.....but its better guys since that will prevent cheating...AND PIRACY (you would not be able to fly online)

Baron 01-13-2011 11:28 PM

"IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs Of Dover

The name is for real. Just got that confirmed. I'm going to change the name of the forum."


From goud over at SimHQ (hope he dont mind)

Sasha 01-14-2011 01:13 AM

Online DRM has destroyed SilentHunter series... 90% of real fans where outraged and abandoned series, disgusted... I've seen it all.

Now... it is turn to Il-2 series - to end up in recycle bin of simulation history.

Very, very sad... after years of waiting - we end up with online DRM and Ubisoft ?!?

nearmiss 01-14-2011 01:22 AM

There is an old saying, "Do not count your chickens until they hatch".

Sasha 01-14-2011 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nearmiss (Post 211930)
There is an old saying, "Do not count your chickens until they hatch".

when they hatch - it is too late...

This is the last moment to avoid Ubisoft "single player permanent connection and online save..." rubbish.

But it takes a loud voice of il-2 community warning!!!

( I am afraid that Oleg has already signed his Ubisoft marriage... )

nearmiss 01-14-2011 02:16 AM

Oleg has a mind of his own, and the most excellent air combat simulator available, even now with the old Il2.

He has many years of experience with Ubisoft. I'm quite sure there will be mutual respect in any agreement they will make.

Ubisoft blew it when they put invasive piracy protection in PE-2 addon and it bombed. There was no further PE-2 type protection in any subsequent add on Il2 releases. A lesson learned I would say.

You can complain of course, but don't make a nuisance of yourself in the process on these boards. Our members will only tolerate so much...

Thanks

brando 01-14-2011 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha (Post 211928)
Online DRM has destroyed SilentHunter series... 90% of real fans where outraged and abandoned series, disgusted... I've seen it all.

Now... it is turn to Il-2 series - to end up in recycle bin of simulation history.

Very, very sad... after years of waiting - we end up with online DRM and Ubisoft ?!?

As I read it, the majority of people gave up on Silent Hunter V because it wasn't anywhere near as good as its predecessors game-wise, not because of DRM. We know that's not going to be the same with this sim.

Given that many of us are prepared to fork over our money in the general direction of Oleg & Co I for one will be glad to see some form of DRM involved - I want to see this production become successful and be profitable, not available free to anyone without a conscience. And if you think that everyone would pay up 'cos we're all sim fans' then you're out of your mind.

nearmiss 01-14-2011 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sasha (Post 211934)
when they hatch - it is too late...

This is the last moment to avoid Ubisoft "single player permanent connection and online save..." rubbish.

But it takes a loud voice of il-2 community warning!!!

( I am afraid that Oleg has already signed his Ubisoft marriage... )

You really don't know this community very well. There would be no putting up with any online only arrangement.

Oleg knows that, he is very in-touch with his users. Online activation, if it is used will probably be a first time activation only.

speculum jockey 01-14-2011 03:12 AM

DRM
DRM
DRM
DRM


Stop it with the DRM ranting! Ubisoft released Silent Hunter V and Assassin Creed II with that "Constant online DRM" and they soon afterwards released patches to remove it. They learned their lesson. R.U.S.E. was just released and it didn't have that DRM, just the "Activate then Play" DRM.

Maybe you should wait until we have an answer before you start working yourselves into a frenzy and smashing all your Warhammer 40K figurines and ripping your anime posters off the wall.

Sure Ubisoft is run by shortsighted crooks. Sure they are heavy handed when dealing with developers and they manufacture child porn on the side, but they do learn from their mistakes when it costs them money. Just be patient and wait for an answer from Oleg or Ubisoft themselves.

SEE 01-14-2011 03:16 AM

WOP requires activation and you have to deactivate the installation if you need to install it again or transfer it to another PC. Is it likely that SOW be restricted to a single PC licence (as with WOP)?

speculum jockey 01-14-2011 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEE (Post 211953)
WOP requires activation and you have to deactivate the installation if you need to install it again or transfer it to another PC. Is it likely that SOW be restricted to a single PC licence (as with WOP)?

We'll have to wait and see when it's out or if Ubisoft makes a press release. I'm guessing Oleg is going to keep his mouth shut since that's probably a "publisher question" that he isn't allowed to answer. Honestly I wouldn't really care about the activation/deactivation thing for installing and uninstalling since I can't afford 2 PC's that will run it.

Sasha 01-14-2011 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brando (Post 211943)
As I read it, the majority of people gave up on Silent Hunter V because it wasn't anywhere near as good as its predecessors game-wise, not because of DRM.

Wrong mate... fans expressed themselves, very clearly (but too late):

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=160783

Considering that these are "hardcore" fans... you can imagine the rest of market... (former market)

:(

carl 01-14-2011 07:53 AM

I have been waiting at least 2 weeks for this sim to come, when it comes i will buy it regardless having same publisher as il2,drm,steam,punkbuster,internetor even if i had to have a made in russia oleg approved pc to run it i will buy it!

Unless i can get a dodgy download

Richie 01-14-2011 08:58 AM

So now that the publisher has been introduced is the release date up to them?

carl 01-14-2011 09:16 AM

Interim germany 28 march, i think some of us are hoping for announcement today, you never know,oleg may say 2 weeks

Dano 01-14-2011 10:21 AM

Oleg probably wont say anything, it's down to UBI to announce and that still hasn't changed even after the leak.

Doogerie 01-14-2011 11:34 AM

I thaught it would be UBI I hoped it wasent but hell i am still going to get it and as they said then bash the bosh...and sh*t (If you watch Armstronf and miller you will under stand that)

RaM85 01-14-2011 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron (Post 211906)
"IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs Of Dover

The name is for real. Just got that confirmed. I'm going to change the name of the forum."


From goud over at SimHQ (hope he dont mind)

I saw that too but i tought it was a fake. I prefer the Bob:saw title btw, I think it is more striking....oh well I' ll just put on Eric Johnson when I'll install it :P

(Ubi please don't F- this up >.<)

Insuber 01-14-2011 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carl (Post 212007)
Interim germany 28 march, i think some of us are hoping for announcement today, you never know,oleg may say 2 weeks

Does anybody still believe to release dates of online game shops? Not backed up by any official statement? OMG, that's really wishful thinking. On my side I'm like St-Thomas, I will believe to a date when I will see the DVD on a (even virtual) shelf.

My advice: enjoy the 4.10, explore all the new functions and novelties, and wait for the 4.11 with 6DOF (I hope!), mates. Il2 is still a top-notch flight sim, anyway.

Cheers,
Insuber

Chivas 01-14-2011 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insuber (Post 212056)
Does anybody still believe to release dates of online game shops? Not backed up by any official statement? OMG, that's really wishful thinking. On my side I'm like St-Thomas, I will believe to a date when I will see the DVD on a (even virtual) shelf.

My advice: enjoy the 4.10, explore all the new functions and novelties, and wait for the 4.11 with 6DOF (I hope!), mates. Il2 is still a top-notch flight sim, anyway.

Cheers,
Insuber

Nobody believed the release date posted, as thats ALWAYS subject to change. What was exiting is the credible info on the name change, possibility we could see the sim early this year, and rumored announcement next week. The name change has been confirmed by credible sources and Oleg has confirmed the official announcement next week.

edited to read "this year".

Triggaaar 01-14-2011 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 211951)
Stop it with the DRM ranting! Ubisoft released Silent Hunter V and Assassin Creed II with that "Constant online DRM" and they soon afterwards released patches to remove it.

I'm not too concerned about the BoB DRM, I'd be happy with online activation, and I don't think they'll require always on (if they did I'd be mad). But I wanted to buy Assassins Creed 2 this christmas, and I didn't because it STILL (at least 2 weeks ago) requires a connection every single time you play. That's an improvement on what it was, but still not good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 212206)
What was exiting is the credible info on the name change, possibility we could see the sim early next year

What? You're excited that we could see it early next year. Wow, you really are a pessimistic fellow.

Chivas 01-14-2011 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triggaaar (Post 212267)
I'm not too concerned about the BoB DRM, I'd be happy with online activation, and I don't think they'll require always on (if they did I'd be mad). But I wanted to buy Assassins Creed 2 this christmas, and I didn't because it STILL (at least 2 weeks ago) requires a connection every single time you play. That's an improvement on what it was, but still not good.

What? You're excited that we could see it early next year. Wow, you really are a pessimistic fellow.

oops its already next year, lol

The Kraken 01-14-2011 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 212300)
plz read all the post and interviews of Oleg.

Sure, no real promises, but statements.

Oleg pointed out several times that it's not his decision but the publisher's. Not sure how one could read that differently, all pretty unambiguous.

Dano 01-14-2011 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 212300)
plz read all the post and interviews of Oleg.

Sure, no real promises, but statements.

I have, that's the point, Oleg didn't promise anything of the kind, it's you that needs to re-read his posts and adjust your comments.

Triggaaar 01-14-2011 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 212277)
oops its already next year, lol

Ah, you're still hungover from 2010 - that makes more sense than you hoping we'll see this in 2012.

swiss 01-15-2011 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 212388)
i know, what i have read, maybe some posts has been deleted.

First Oleg told us - no DRM at all - now it is up to the publisher. WTF?

Why they will not publish the game by themselves?

strategic decision, big partner, more distribution channels = higher chance of success.
Plus, (guess) if it's indeed a success, maybe ubi helps to finance successors.

Chivas 01-15-2011 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 212388)
i know, what i have read, maybe some posts has been deleted.

First Oleg told us - no DRM at all - now it is up to the publisher. WTF?

Why they will not publish the game by themselves?

It would be hard to publish the game themselves if Ubi has been footing a portion of the development costs for all these years. I also don't believe Oleg ever said there would be not be a DRM. They will have to some sort of protection unless they want to lose alot of money.

Dano 01-15-2011 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domian (Post 212388)
i know, what i have read, maybe some posts has been deleted.

First Oleg told us - no DRM at all - now it is up to the publisher. WTF?

Why they will not publish the game by themselves?

No he didn't. He might have said he preferred no DRM but he made no promise that it would ship with none.

robtek 01-15-2011 10:06 AM

And don't confuse DRM with copy-protection, thats two pairs of shoes.

Heliocon 01-15-2011 03:29 PM

Dont know if this was posted but Ubisoft just changed their DRM a few weeks ago. You only need to verify your game online now, after that you can play offline and do not need a constant connection. Was on PC gamer news.

Hecke 01-15-2011 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 212475)
Dont know if this was posted but Ubisoft just changed their DRM a few weeks ago. You only need to verify your game online now, after that you can play offline and do not need a constant connection. Was on PC gamer news.

Do you have to varify it online every time you play the game?

Sasha 01-15-2011 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 212475)
Dont know if this was posted but Ubisoft just changed their DRM a few weeks ago. You only need to verify your game online now, after that you can play offline and do not need a constant connection. Was on PC gamer news.

Was it officiall Ubisoft statemnt ?:rolleyes:

Or...somebody... said something...

Sutts 01-15-2011 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 212475)
Dont know if this was posted but Ubisoft just changed their DRM a few weeks ago. You only need to verify your game online now, after that you can play offline and do not need a constant connection. Was on PC gamer news.

Good news indeed.:grin:

Triggaaar 01-15-2011 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sutts (Post 212532)
Good news indeed.:grin:

Yes, but...
Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 212475)
Ubisoft just changed their DRM a few weeks ago. You only need to verify your game online now, after that you can play offline and do not need a constant connection. Was on PC gamer news.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 212480)
Do you have to varify it online every time you play the game?

As Hecke points out, it's not clearly once only. Assassin's Creed 2 still requires you to be online every single time you play. So no playing that on the laptop away from home.

speculum jockey 01-16-2011 01:30 AM

There's no point arguing or speculating since nobody know for sure. Maybe they only use the "always online" DRM for their A++ titles for a month or so, then patch it out. Maybe a second string title like COD won't have it to begin with. We're just going to have to wait for the official press release to know.

Honestly, I don't know what the executives over at Ubisoft love more. Intrusive DRM or denying the holocaust. :rolleyes:

furbs 01-16-2011 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 212606)

Honestly, I don't know what the executives over at Ubisoft love more. Intrusive DRM or Child Pornography. :rolleyes:


you might want to edit that....its in very very poor taste.

winny 01-16-2011 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 212719)
you might want to edit that....its in very very poor taste.

What do you expect from someone called speculum jockey...?

speculum jockey 01-16-2011 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 212719)
you might want to edit that....its in very very poor taste.

Better?

Talbot 01-17-2011 09:31 AM

New release date 30.06.2011 ???

http://www.gameexpres.cz/hra-pre-pc-...r-p-12262.html

Triggaaar 01-17-2011 10:26 AM

Should they not have Russian on their box art, rather than just copying the box art we've already seen?

Does anyone like the name Cliffs of Dover? I'm not really bothered, but it's a terrible name. What on earth is wrong with BoB? Everyone knows what that means. Everyone also knows what CoD is, and it's not a flight simulator.

Bobb4 01-17-2011 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triggaaar (Post 212882)
Should they not have Russian on their box art, rather than just copying the box art we've already seen?

Does anyone like the name Cliffs of Dover? I'm not really bothered, but it's a terrible name. What on earth is wrong with BoB? Everyone knows what that means. Everyone also knows what CoD is, and it's not a flight simulator.

Cliffs of Dover is the name for the area of conflict. The name of the sim is IL2 STURMOVIK which I am sure will be carried over through the series.
Just like Battle over Korea - IL2 STURMOVIK will be the name of there next sim :grin:

winny 01-17-2011 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobb4 (Post 212905)
Cliffs of Dover is the name for the area of conflict. The name of the sim is IL2 STURMOVIK which I am sure will be carried over through the series.
Just like Battle over Korea - IL2 STURMOVIK will be the name of there next sim :grin:

Cliffs of Dover is a little bit too specific.. More of a landmark than an area.
What next? 'France - The Battle of the Eifel Tower'?

Like most I don't really care what it's called but Cliffs of Dover misses the point slightly it's too, er.. narrow(?)

Hecke 01-17-2011 04:42 PM

No, next will be...

deep blue water of pacific
hot sand of africain desert


Oleg, you failed with a very important decision.

The Kraken 01-17-2011 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 212972)
Oleg, you failed with a very important decision.

It's not his decision, it's not nearly as important as some people seem to make it, and whether it's indeed a failure is anyone's guess at this point. Otherwise you're correct though :-P

Wutz 01-17-2011 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 212972)
No, next will be...

deep blue water of pacific
hot sand of africain desert


Oleg, you failed with a very important decision.

What are you going to play? The titel or the game?
All that is now missing is a debate if the color of the box is right or not....:rolleyes:

Hecke 01-17-2011 05:27 PM

calling this sim "IL2 Sturmovik - Cliffs of Dover"

is as crappy as

calling Race driver grid "VW Käfer - black asphalt of the road"


I could imagine that Ubisoft wants to kill all russian developing studios to become the only monopole. That would justify the decision.

Maxy 01-17-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 212985)
calling this sim "IL2 Sturmovik - Cliffs of Dover"

is as crappy as

calling Race driver grid "VW Käfer - black asphalt of the road"


I could imagine that Ubisoft wants to kill all russian developing studios to become the only monopole. That would justify the decision.

Building brands is a costly process. By using the old name they can target people who know the brand but are not hardcore enthusiastic enough to know that SOW is made by the same people.. So businesswise it's a very logical decision. IL-2 is a hugely acclaimed brand so why not use it in a "sequel" ?

Anyway. I don't understand this nitpicking about stupid things.. Why do you care what's the name of the game? As long as it flys well I'm happy.

robtek 01-17-2011 09:39 PM

Too much stowed energy!!!

Flying Pencil 01-17-2011 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wutz (Post 212979)
What are you going to play? The titel or the game?
All that is now missing is a debate if the color of the box is right or not....:rolleyes:

No, its not!
























runs

Flying Pencil 01-17-2011 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxy (Post 212990)
Building brands is a costly process. By using the old name they can target people who know the brand but are not hardcore enthusiastic enough to know that SOW is made by the same people.. So businesswise it's a very logical decision. IL-2 is a hugely acclaimed brand so why not use it in a "sequel" ?

Anyway. I don't understand this nitpicking about stupid things.. Why do you care what's the name of the game? As long as it flys well I'm happy.

Their is a huge difference between "XYZ: new title" and "New Title. from the makers of XYZ"

IL-2 is a name of an airplane, and the game is named after that famous airplane and focused on that airplane.
BoB did not have that airplane, has no Russian airplane, and is 1000's of KM away from Russia!

robtek 01-18-2011 06:30 AM

SO WHAT???

It's just a name!!!

Whom do you want to impress with your ideas?

99,9% of the readers here know what IL2:CoD stands for and wont confuse it with anything else.

chiefrr73 01-18-2011 08:12 AM

The name of the game doesn´t matter!

But a possible permanent internet connection very well!


On a german forum it was confirmed by UBI_Marc (UBISOFT), that the user has to activate once online and that there don t have to be permanent internet connection.

Tvrdi 01-18-2011 08:54 AM

sorry guys if it was posted before...Will IL2: COD be DX9 or DX10? I think Oleg stated once it wont be opengl....

Flanker35M 01-18-2011 09:17 AM

S!

Tvrdi, it has been said by Oleg that this new sim will be DirectX 9/10/11. With DirectX 11 you get all the bells and whistles where the DirectX 9/10 would be for the lower end machines.

Richie 01-18-2011 10:20 AM

This might be good news. New screenshots at gamepressure.com


http://games.gamepressure.com/view_screen.asp?ID=201184

Richie 01-18-2011 11:00 AM

I guess this is the site to keep our eyes on and check the "News" Their logo looks like a 109 spinner. Anyone else notice that?


http://www.ubi.com/ENCA/default.aspx

Richie 01-18-2011 12:57 PM

No! Because it is the usual Ubi Logo...


================================================== ====================

Yes I know it's a fluke but... Let the Messerschmitt force be with us! 8 )

nearmiss 01-18-2011 07:03 PM

Looks like we can unsticky this thread, moving onward and upward to better discussions.

bn880 02-25-2011 12:49 AM

Shareable planes?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire9 (Post 202876)
Does anyone know if players will be able to attach to another player's aircraft in SOW to, say, man the ball turret on a bomber?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feathered_IV (Post 202894)
Yes. Lol, am I the only one who retains information around here? :lol:

Can someone confirm this? Not sure what the source is that's all (did Oleg say this?). Quite interested to know if aircraft will be "shareable" in MP as well. Especially for bombers and their turrets.

If so, will players be able to Join In Progress to a turret on an already flying bomber piloted by another player? Or is this only avail on takeoff/menu?

lwlooz 03-14-2011 12:52 AM

Hello,

Quote:

Originally Posted by bn880
If so, will players be able to Join In Progress to a turret on an already flying bomber piloted by another player?

I would second this information request as the most wanted feature that I have would be hopping into another bomber and playing gunner once your plane has been shot down.

Thanks if anyone knows

baronWastelan 06-15-2011 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baronWastelan (Post 199879)
6 mos - 1 yr from now, best estimate. Cheers and welcome to the forum! Bonjour!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triggaaar (Post 199892)
I think that's a failry persimistic estimate, it really shouldn't take a year from when it was demonstrated to the press. I'd estimate about 4 - 7 months.

Nov 21 ---> Jul 19 = 8 months. Optimism is no substitute for expert opinion.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.