It depends if he's hamstrung by the kind of "Do as your told or hit the road" production ethic that so many big names in production favour. Jackson can make a good film but $pielberg might not let him.

Anyone who's going to see it post up in here what you thought.

Majority or minority...neither has anything to do with it. Look up ad hominem. Here's one partial definition to get you started: "An attempt to argue against an opponent's idea by discrediting the opponent himself"...to wit, your resort to "Some of you guys are truly sorry nerds. Get a life."

Now I am done with it.

have fun richie..im going to see the new love of my life..Gina Carano...hot and a bad ass!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFV0Uvzpz0o

Good for you but I don't think I'm going to go...Maybe I'll go see The Descendants again.

Try this one
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1675434/

Sounds good

Does nobody do an original idea any more......it's just Bourne again.

Except that chick Carano is a legit MMA fighter. So she could actually kick your arse, unlike that Bourne sissy :D

I'm going to go see it. Where else are you going to view 109s, P-51s, B-17s on a big screen? This kind of thing doesn't come around all the time, and I think it warrants a visit to the cinema by me. I've spent money on a lot worse junk in my life. Despite the innacuaracies and other complaints I'll enjoy it just for the ability to see the above mentioned.

We live in an "American/British/Scandanavia/Australia IDOL" kind of environment where the superficial is lauded more than the substantive. If it sizzles it has to be good, but when you get to the actually eating of the steak it's bland and tuff. Most don't care enough to separate the two. It's not just a symptom of Hollywood. It's universal IMO.