Super 3 on the 20K test using coral sea map. I used that map for all the tests I did. I also took video of the tests if that helps although it would be simple to set up a scenario.

I do appreciate your "ear" on this and your responses.

(I also pondered the TAS vs IAS but the comparison shows air is air)

Likewise

Sawyer your 20,000Ft figures for 4.11 are way off. in your post 120 You got these numbers:

20,000ft
4.101 – 222kias
4.11 - 160kias
i.e. a diff of 62KIAS

I re tested in both 4.10.1 and 4.11.
F4U1C, 100% Fuel, Rad 2, 100% Power Prop pitch 100%, Supercharger 3 Default, Crimea Midday
I get 220KIAS or 579KMH TAS in 4.10.1
I get 210KIAS or 566KMH TAS in 4.11
A diff of 10KIAS or 12KMH TAS

Wonder Woman view cockpits off with the gaudy circular instruments :)

Hombre be more specific at what altitude ?

Try everything at Sea level Crimea. See what numbers you get then compare them to a specific chart from your reference.

Also read the title of that report .. it refers to a test for max performance at War Emergency Power of a "Cleaned up version"

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...rsairclean.jpg

When I test in 4.11 Again Crimea Midday, WEP, RAD 2, 100% Fuel at 19,000ft (FTH Supercharger 3) I get the following:
240KIAS,280MPH IAS, 633KMH TAS (that works out at 393MPH TAS or 342Knots TAS)

The Max speed achieved in the Cleaned up test aircraft was as the report shows 429MPH TAS (averaged of the 2 runs). Its also worth pointing out they flew the test at 23,000ft, rather than the 19,000ft I flew the test.

Perhaps it would be helpful if you would share the performance data you used to model the aircraft as well. I'm doing the best I can here by researching and citing my references but I feel that I am simply hitting a brick wall. I'm sure your data is more relevant and official and I would like to see it as well if you don't mind?

Also, if you look at the date of the document these tests were conducted on the earlier model F4U-1 in 1943. After which the aerodynamic and performance improvements were made and then the C and D models were developed. Take a look at this doc from the US Navy Bureau of Aeronautics dated 1945 on the test results of the F4U-1C and 1D models, FULLY LOADED (defined in the doc), which we also use in the sim:

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...f4u-1d-acp.pdf

I gotta give you that one, WEP made a big difference. I was running at 99% throttle in the test I posted (forgot to mention that). I just tested again with WEP (no rad) and got it to 220kias per the speedbar.

I'll get together with my squad and do some more testing and research in the next couple days.

Again, I appreciate your time on this matter.

It says 409 mph top and this is what you get in game.

Would be nice to not clutter up a General debugging topic with a single FM debate.

How is this achieved? Altitude, throttle, pitch, fuel, armament, difficulty switches (overheating on/off)? I have never been able to get this out of a Corsair in this sim in level flight with full real settings or otherwise. Please give me a scenario and I will try to duplicate it.

The issue was already underway in this thread before I made a post. If it would be better in addressed another thread go ahead and move all the posts on this issue there. It isn't my intention to clutter anything up.

^^This^^