Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Daidalos Team discussions (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   4.12.2 de-bugging (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=40139)

idefix44 09-11-2013 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aviar (Post 509195)
Was it possoble to lock the tailwheel from the cockpit in the real-life Hurricane? The reason I'm asking is because the command does not work for any Hurricane model in 4.12.1.

Aviar

The question is : How is it possible to keep the plane safe with the tailwheel unlocked? :rolleyes:

sniperton 09-11-2013 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idefix44 (Post 509199)
The question is : How is it possible to keep the plane safe with the tailwheel unlocked? :rolleyes:

Takeoff: increase throttle gradually, counterwork with the rudder, and never use the breaks. I start rolling with 50% throttle, and once the tail is lifted, I give max power.

Landing: break only when the rudder is in neutral position.

BTW, has anyone tested systematically which planes lost their tailwheel lock capability with 4.12.1? And is it a bug or a feature?

KG26_Alpha 09-11-2013 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aviar (Post 509195)
Was it possoble to lock the tailwheel from the cockpit in the real-life Hurricane?

Aviar

No

wheelsup_cavu 09-18-2013 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pursuivant (Post 508404)
Maybe it's an old bug, but on QMB maps where one side only has aircraft carriers to land on (e.g., Hawaii, Coral Sea, Midway) non-carrier aircraft will still attempt to land on the carriers.

Maybe this is a QMB bug, maybe it's another AI glitch.

Either way, non-carrier aircraft should either be programmed to exit in the direction of the nearest historical friendly base or to ditch rather than landing.

Interestingly, carriers don't suffer damage from having heavy bombers crash land on them!

This is not a bug, it is how the mission waypoints for landing are utilized. If the template maker attaches the LANDING waypoint to a carrier all aircraft will attempt to land on the carrier. If the template maker attaches the LANDING waypoint to a land airfield all aircraft will land at that location.

There are 8 flights per side and each flight will always follow the same waypoints that are on the template that is loaded by the QMB. There is no variety to the waypoints that the planes will follow unless the template maker has made more than one template of the same mission and changes the waypoints for each flight. The template that is loaded will determine the waypoints that each flight will follow but every time that particular template is loaded you will get the waypoints that were used on that template, there is no variation done to those waypoints by the QMB.

I made the Hawaii and Midway templates for the QMB and made the choice to allow planes to land on the carriers since in older versions of the QMB prior to allowing the templates to be user created the planes would just land in the ocean since the LANDING waypoints were not attached to the carriers. I know it's not perfect but due to the limitations of the QMB I felt allowing the aircraft to land on the carriers was better than having them land in the ocean and sink. Unless a way can be made to allow for multiple LANDING options per flight that takes into consideration the type of aircraft that is using that set of waypoints then this will always be a choice that has to be made by the QMB template maker when it comes to allowing aircraft to land on the carrier. :)


Wheels

Tempest123 09-18-2013 03:27 PM

has anyone had AI planes landing gear collapse on the runway before takeoff, I experienced this with several planes in the QMB, MiG 3 Yak 3 and yak 9. Doesn't seem to occur in FMB with taxi to takeoff. Also pilotless AI aircraft hold their airspeed, attitude and heading indefinitely, meaning a damaged aircraft can keep climbing forever (defying physics).

Pursuivant 09-18-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wheelsup_cavu (Post 509371)
This is not a bug, it is how the mission waypoints for landing are utilized.

Fair enough. I'll accept that it's a limitation on the QMB. Sounds like something for the next "readme" file, so sticklers for historically accuracy know to specify carrier-capable planes in their QMB missions.

I'd still hold that it's a bug that heavy aircraft attempting to land on a carrier don't cause damage or at least stick around longer, however. I don't know what the weight limits were on a carrier's deck (probably pretty impressive, given that B-25 were able to take off from a U.S. fleet carrier), but a crashed medium bomber on deck would take some time to clear, and a fire involving such an aircraft might take some time to put out.

cacha 09-19-2013 08:19 PM

Trains can kill themselves with their own AAA. They aim at you but hit their own wagons. This almost always happens for me.

idefix44 09-19-2013 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cacha (Post 509411)
Trains can kill themselves with their own AAA. They aim at you but hit their own wagons. This almost always happens for me.

The same thing happend with truck columns. Old problem.

Alexander (C) 09-20-2013 08:26 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Why no smoke when Ta-152-C in a fire?

Notorious M.i.G. 09-20-2013 11:28 AM

It's most likely the fuel tanks that are on fire, they burn without leaving the big black smoketrails. Commonly happens with the Pe-2/3 too if you hit it near the wingroot.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.