Again, note nothing is provided to support these wild claims.. No screen capture let alone track file showing the 'speed' let alone a link to or post of the real world data that this claim is too slow is related to..

Long story short, talk is cheap when it comes to claims about FM's being broke

stop tryignto go offtopic. There are plenty of thereads talkign about FMs. If oyu want to see the evidence of it being broke or perfect go into to appropriate forum and stop piccking a fight.

Why don't I do it?

Easy.. Because I am NOT the one saying it is too this or too that

But you do bring up a good point!

Why aren't the people who are saying it providing the proof?

If I had to guess, most wouldn't know the first thing about how to preform the test let alone provide the results of the test

Your missing the point

I am not say it is too this or too that

I am simply pointing out the fact that no one has provided anything that would be considered proof one way or another with regards to being too this or too that

Based on my past experience I know enough about testing to know that upon closer inspection it would be found that most of the errors folks are so called 'reporting' are due to pilot an test method errors not FM errors.

Which again is why I am 'asking' people to provide the 'info' that their claims are based on.. Put another way, talk is cheap! Put even another way, put up or shut up.

Clearly you do not understand what 'fact' means

As I allready pointed out 'talkign' is cheap

Better yet, why don't the people making the claims simply post a link to the topic when ask? Why? Well I allready said why they don't.