Official Fulqrum Publishing forum
Page 37 of 43 « First 273536 37 3839 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update, Q&A - December 23, 2011 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=28633)

furbs 01-01-2012 09:30 PM
A open question.

Does any have a idea when this series will be as strong as IL2 now?
im talking 400-700 every night, sqds playing online wars.

are we talking something that is still years off? or can we hope that BOM will be the start?

ACE-OF-ACES 01-01-2012 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by addman (Post 375388)
Even if the split is 80% online and only 20% offline players (which it most likely isn't) it still means that 20% of the players might be put off by the lack of offline content and might not continue to buy MG sims in the future. For such a niche market those 20% are very important. But hey, if they don't want my money, that's fine too.:)
You misunderstood what I was saying..

I was not talking about the SPLIT between 'user' types, i.e. ONLINE USER vs OFFLINE USER

I was referring to the SPLIT in game makers resources.. As in prior to ONLINE gaming (1990 like) game makers did NOT have to devote some of their resources to the ONLINE aspect of the game.. Because there was none.. Thus those resources could be applied to making better AI and OFFLINE Campaigns

Since you brought it up, I would guess the SPLIT in users is even smaller than 20% OFFLINE only.. Which should not be confused with how vocal that group can be! as in the squeaky wheel senario! ;)

ACE-OF-ACES 01-01-2012 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs (Post 375392)
A open question.

Does any have a idea when this series will be as strong as IL2 now?
im talking 400-700 every night, sqds playing online wars.

are we talking something that is still years off? or can we hope that BOM will be the start?
My guess is when it will happen it will be a title wave effect..

IMHO The problem is not with the current state of CoD bugs as much as the limited number of planes one can fly and the number of maps.. Everyone knows a new sim takes time to work out the bugs!

Which is why I am so happy to hear about the sequel!!

So I think it will be a few more sequels before you see CoD numbers matching IL-2s

But it does say a lot for 1C and their products!

When the biggest competition they have is a sim they made 10 years ago! ;)

addman 01-01-2012 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 375393)
You misunderstood what I was saying..

I was not talking about the SPLIT between 'user' types, i.e. ONLINE USER vs OFFLINE USER

I was referring to the SPLIT in game makers resources.. As in prior to ONLINE gaming (1990 like) game makers did NOT have to devote some of their resources to the ONLINE aspect of the game.. Because there was none.. Thus those resources could be applied to making better AI and OFFLINE Campaigns

Since you brought it up, I would guess the SPLIT in users is even smaller than 20% OFFLINE only.. Which should not be confused with how vocal that group can be! as in the squeaky wheel senario! ;)
Ok, simple misunderstanding there.:)

major_setback 01-03-2012 11:30 PM
Thanks for the information B6 and Luthier!! Nice to hear that there is a future for the game and the sequels.

Please don't listen too much to those who speak loudest.

Buchon 01-05-2012 02:46 PM
Quote:
2. Will you reenable cockpit shake that existed in the earlier versions? :
Quote:
We actually removed it because the fans requested it.
This effect was overdone in early versions so guess is why the players get annoyed.

But the completely remove of cockpit shake is a waste :

- this cockpit shake can be a useful effect for stall entry's, standard and dynamic.

- Also on high structural stress in turnings, can be a perfect combination with the wind sound and structural stress sound.

Of course if its not overdone.

TomcatViP 01-05-2012 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon (Post 376532)
This effect was overdone in early versions so guess is why the players get annoyed.

But the completely remove of cockpit shake is a waste :

- this cockpit shake can be a useful effect for stall entry's, standard and dynamic.

- Also on high structural stress in turnings, can be a perfect combination with the wind sound and structural stress sound.

Of course if its not overdone.
+1

Tte. Costa 01-05-2012 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP (Post 376578)
+1
+1+1

jippy13 01-06-2012 06:08 PM
Hello Luthier,

Could you post a "Friday update information" each Friday to give us some information about the work made by your team during the week ? Just some words with or without screenshoots.

I think it will be a very good thing for the game and for everybody (your team and COD community)

kestrel79 01-06-2012 08:29 PM
Probably won't see anything for a week or two, as aren't the Russian holidays right now?But yes after that I'd like to bring back some friday updates.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 AM.
Page 37 of 43 « First 273536 37 3839 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.