Originally Posted by adonys (Post 327660)

"minimum 2 weeks" might also be read as 2 months, 2 years, 2 decades, 2 hundred years, 2 thousand years or even never-ever.

the communication fault is of Luthier's who doesn't understand that, while saying "minimum 2 weeks" won't bound you to release anything after those 2 weeks time period (and it's a good thing he learned that), it still bounds you to give an update of the situation after the said 2 weeks, or close enough..

I still can't understand the failure of spending exactly 5 minutes to post something like "guys, we're sorry we couldn't managed it in two weeks, it seems we'll need another three at least, so see you then. thank you for your patience!"..

Originally Posted by Dano (Post 327713)

What part of "two weeks minimum" is proving to be so hard to understand?

Originally Posted by Dano (Post 327713)

What part of "two weeks minimum" is proving to be so hard to understand?

Originally Posted by Zorin (Post 327733)

1. Nothing is hard about that.
2. STILL what is so hard about taking two minnutes to post a simple sentence saying that it takes them a bit longer? NOTHING
3. Why don't they understand that they would appease a lot of the community by just doing that, posting regular updates that give rough directions for what is going on?

Seriously, how hard can it be?

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327744)

Its also not that hard to figure out that things are going as well as hoped. Or for the conspiracy theorists " They have the patch done but really enjoy reading all the crap in the forums".

Originally Posted by Tree_UK (Post 327746)

Well stop posting crap.......

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 327744)

Its also not that hard to figure out that things are going as well as hoped. Or for the conspiracy theorists " They have the patch done but really enjoy reading all the crap in the forums".