Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=132)
-   -   name this plane (for fun) (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=10953)

haitch40 11-25-2009 05:49 PM

erm a giant mass of strings n wings

Vulcan607 11-25-2009 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haitch40 (Post 122614)
erm a giant mass of strings n wings

close but no cigar

Reddisback 11-25-2009 07:33 PM

one variant of Catalina?

Vulcan607 11-25-2009 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reddisback (Post 122634)
one variant of Catalina?

sorry but no. Think WWII British Aircraft manufacturer with a history of seaplanes.

Robotic Pope 11-25-2009 07:51 PM

Is that DeHavilland Hornet part of the question? Its one of my favourite fighters. I can tell that its a Hornet F mk3 too because it has the extended tail fin.

No idea about the bi plane though. Looks a bit like a Sunderland though so maybe its an earlier plane built by Shorts?

Vulcan607 11-25-2009 07:57 PM

Yeah De Haviland Sea Hornet
and no not a Shorts.

Robotic Pope 11-25-2009 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 122643)
Yeah De Haviland Sea Hornet
and no not a Shorts.

lol Damn it. I can even see the arrester hook. Its a F.mk20 then. (naval version of the F.mk3)

Vulcan607 11-25-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robotic Pope (Post 122648)
lol Damn it. I can even see the arrester hook. Its a F.mk20 then. (naval version of the F.mk3)

Win, now only the seaplane to go

Robotic Pope 11-25-2009 08:47 PM

Well I had to look in a book to find out what it is. I guess thats cheating so I wont say what it is. I will give a clue though lol............ I am the Great Sea Eggman.

Martinho 11-25-2009 09:18 PM

haha maybe not

Wissam24 11-26-2009 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robotic Pope (Post 122653)
Well I had to look in a book to find out what it is. I guess thats cheating so I wont say what it is. I will give a clue though lol............ I am the Great Sea Eggman.

Nice...on that basis I will say the Supermarine Walrus.

Excellent clueing there my friend!

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 03:57 PM

Congratulations
Supermarine Walrus
and
De Haviland Sea Hornet

haitch40 11-26-2009 04:05 PM

1 Attachment(s)
whats this?

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 04:22 PM

something like a Do-305 or something like that

haitch40 11-26-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 122906)
something like a Do-305 or something like that

nope sorry
close though

Wissam24 11-26-2009 04:37 PM

Do-335 Pfeil

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 04:38 PM

Do-335

Edit: shucks to slow

Wissam24 11-26-2009 04:40 PM

What is this plane?

http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x...bigolplane.jpg

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 05:00 PM

convair xb 36?

haitch40 11-26-2009 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wissam24 (Post 122914)
Do-335 Pfeil

yep

haitch40 11-26-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wissam24 (Post 122916)

B-36 "Peacemaker

Dubbedinenglish 11-26-2009 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wissam24 (Post 122916)

Ugly

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haitch40 (Post 122929)
B-36 "Peacemaker

Used to fly from Burtonwood, Noisy buggers.

Reddisback 11-26-2009 05:43 PM

it's amazing to see what kinda PLanes came out in the 50'ies and 60'ies!
first they went all out Jet Propulled and later Models with Piston Engines came back?!

Panzergranate 11-26-2009 05:54 PM

Convair B-36 "Peacemaker"..... the piston engines suffered from overheating pronlems because of the pusher arrangement.

The jets were to assist take off and climbing to altitude when burdened with maximum payload. Once at the desired altitude they were shut down to conserve fuel.

The aircraft had two seperate fule systems for each engine type.

Some carried a Lockheed Goblin in tests or F-84 as a "parasite fighter" during the Korean War.

haitch40 11-26-2009 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 122939)
Convair B-36 "Peacemaker"..... the piston engines suffered from overheating pronlems because of the pusher arrangement.

The jets were to assist take off and climbing to altitude when burdened with maximum payload. Once at the desired altitude they were shut down to conserve fuel.

The aircraft had two seperate fule systems for each engine type.

Some carried a Lockheed Goblin in tests or F-84 as a "parasite fighter" during the Korean War.

pussher props also had another problem
like with jets they had a higher stalling speed cos the prop pushes air over the wing faster than the air speed with a jet or pusher prop that doesnt happen

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by haitch40 (Post 122941)
pussher props also had another problem
like with jets they had a higher stalling speed cos the prop pushes air over the wing faster than the air speed with a jet or pusher prop that doesnt happen

YAY design flaws

Wissam24 11-26-2009 06:53 PM

Whoever said B-36 first wins

Vulcan607 11-26-2009 07:02 PM

http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acimages...evallentin.jpg

flynlion 11-26-2009 07:30 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's an easy one just for Wissam24:

Spitfire23 11-27-2009 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 122976)
Here's an easy one just for Wissam24:

Boeing 747??
















;)

kozzm0 11-27-2009 02:19 AM

vulcan's is a Sud se-210 caravelle, and Flynlion's is a traffic cop with a bad attitude and an ah-64 apache.

What's with the funny hat choppers like that one wear sometimes

flynlion 11-27-2009 05:35 AM

1 Attachment(s)
2 points for KozzmO :grin:

The funny hat is an electronics package carried by the "longbow' version of the Apache to snoop over terrain. I love that picture, though I suspect it is probably a photoshop. It was sent to me by a good buddy who was an Apache pilot in Iraq. Here's one of him giving his little girl a flying lesson:

kozzm0 11-27-2009 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 123087)
The funny hat is an electronics package carried by the "longbow' version of the Apache to snoop over terrain.

I'm not quite sure I believe that, it looks like maybe the rotor broke so they had to reattach it with a giant nail.

The longbow will be in trouble if it encounters enemies with flying hammers.

An aircraft with a funny hat deserves to be followed by one with a funny name:

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j2...ozz/plane3.jpg

all identifying marks have been blurred out, so no use looking for them.

DannyBooze 11-27-2009 06:56 AM

is it a mirage maybe a rafel?

Wissam24 11-27-2009 01:05 PM

Mirage III?

And yeah, the Apache photo is a photoshop.

On the other hand, this one isn't..

http://pacojonnes.files.wordpress.co...chool-sign.jpg

Haha, bonus if you can name THAT plane

Vulcan607 11-27-2009 04:07 PM

Dassalt Mirage III

kozzm0 11-27-2009 05:38 PM

All good guesses but wrong... remember, funny name

For another hint, the production of this plane involved spies and stolen plans.

The plane in the tree is a Huff-Daland Duster. Leaving the N-number visible is an invitation to cheat, so I did :D

Wissam24 11-27-2009 06:06 PM

No idea but did you hear the F-35 plans were stolen?

flynlion 11-27-2009 06:24 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's another one that is NOT a photoshop:

kozzm0 11-27-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wissam24 (Post 123256)
No idea but did you hear the F-35 plans were stolen?

Some of the info was heisted via computer espionage, or something like that... but not all of it. It had something to do with lax security because of multiple countries having access to the information.

But in the case of the plane above, ALL the plans were stolen, in one of the biggest spy operations of the 20th century. That should be enough of a dead giveaway. If anyone gets mad when they figure it out, at least it's not an obscure prototype, and it is a different plane from the plans.

I think the f-35 plans may as well have been stolen, I believe it's an ill-conceived plane. The US DoD is always banking on multirole planes, the f-18 is a good one but the JSF as a plane that can do everything ends up with flaws in every department. In particular, the US has plenty of big carriers and it's not so vital to have a VTOL plane that can also fight, by adding the VTOL they had to weaken its fuselage to make the weight specs. So it's vulnerable to hits and flak, as currently designed, and it has no answer to the orbital-vectored thrust of the 4.5-generation Russian planes and upcoming PAK-FA.

They expect air combat to be all about beyond-visual range and avionics in the future, they thought the same thing in the 60's and it didn't work. Except when it's not a big war.

[crouches waiting for the swarm of f-35 defenders to attack]

Wissam24 11-27-2009 06:42 PM

No idea from me. I am very intrigued however, so could you pm me the answer, and I publicly swear I won't reveal the answer

Vulcan607 11-27-2009 06:52 PM

Were the plans stolen from Dassalt?

mattmanB182 11-27-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kozzm0 (Post 123262)
Some of the info was heisted via computer espionage, or something like that... but not all of it. It had something to do with lax security because of multiple countries having access to the information.

But in the case of the plane above, ALL the plans were stolen, in one of the biggest spy operations of the 20th century. That should be enough of a dead giveaway. If anyone gets mad when they figure it out, at least it's not an obscure prototype, and it is a different plane from the plans.

I think the f-35 plans may as well have been stolen, I believe it's an ill-conceived plane. The US DoD is always banking on multirole planes, the f-18 is a good one but the JSF as a plane that can do everything ends up with flaws in every department. In particular, the US has plenty of big carriers and it's not so vital to have a VTOL plane that can also fight, by adding the VTOL they had to weaken its fuselage to make the weight specs. So it's vulnerable to hits and flak, as currently designed, and it has no answer to the orbital-vectored thrust of the 4.5-generation Russian planes and upcoming PAK-FA.

They expect air combat to be all about beyond-visual range and avionics in the future, they thought the same thing in the 60's and it didn't work. Except when it's not a big war.

[crouches waiting for the swarm of f-35 defenders to attack]

Why would the F-35 have defenders? Its garbage, they only want it because its far cheaper than the F-22.

I am biased because I love the F-22. A shame that our inept leadership cancelled the thing.

mattmanB182 11-27-2009 07:11 PM

Not sure if this one has been posted yet, I dont feel like going through all the pages. I am pretty sure I know who will guess this one. My bad on the poor quality. :(

http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...0182/guess.jpg
http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...182/guess2.jpg

Spitfire23 11-27-2009 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmanB182 (Post 123280)
Not sure if this one has been posted yet, I dont feel like going through all the pages. I am pretty sure I know who will guess this one. My bad on the poor quality. :(

http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...0182/guess.jpg
http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...182/guess2.jpg

Gotta be a B-29 superfortress ;)

Edit: Oh and what looks like a model B-29 with russian markings

flynlion 11-27-2009 07:47 PM

Gotta agree about the F-35. What good is a VSTOL combat plane if you can't get fuel, ammo, MTX and other support to it in the field? Are they planning on flying all that stuff to it by helicopter or V-22?

Has the F-22 been cancelled or just reduced in number? Seems like there's a squadron in Langley that's already flying the thing. It is a bad assed plane, but I personally don't feel like paying for it. What's it going to fight that can't be dealt with by a few updated F-15s ?

flynlion 11-27-2009 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123288)
Gotta be a B-29 superfortress ;)

Edit: Oh and what looks like a model B-29 with russian markings

It's the Russian B-29, called the "Bull".

Soviet Ace 11-27-2009 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmanB182 (Post 123280)
Not sure if this one has been posted yet, I dont feel like going through all the pages. I am pretty sure I know who will guess this one. My bad on the poor quality. :(

http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...0182/guess.jpg
http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...182/guess2.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 123292)
It's the Russian B-29, called the "Bull".

Better known not as the 'Russian B-29', but the actual Soviet designation 'Tu-4 Bull'. :D

Spitfire23 11-27-2009 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soviet Ace (Post 123295)
Better known not as the 'Russian B-29', but the actual Soviet designation 'Tu-4 Bull'. :D

Ahh right, learn something everyday :grin:

Edit: so it's my turn now right?

Spitfire23 11-27-2009 08:35 PM

Ok, here is my next one.

This one is with it's wings removed
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?738492026

And here it is WITH wings. (Edited it to make it easier to see and to avoid Cheaters ;))
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?493372976

trk29 11-27-2009 09:13 PM

Same picture.

Martinho 11-27-2009 11:32 PM

One of teh saabs? viggen?

Quote:

Originally Posted by kozzm0 (Post 123246)
All good guesses but wrong... remember, funny name

For another hint, the production of this plane involved spies and stolen plans.

The plane in the tree is a Huff-Daland Duster. Leaving the N-number visible is an invitation to cheat, so I did :D


Martinho 11-27-2009 11:41 PM

That sounds like concord :grin:

Dassault dagger

Quote:

Originally Posted by kozzm0 (Post 123262)
Some of the info was heisted via computer espionage, or something like that... but not all of it. It had something to do with lax security because of multiple countries having access to the information.

But in the case of the plane above, ALL the plans were stolen, in one of the biggest spy operations of the 20th century. That should be enough of a dead giveaway. If anyone gets mad when they figure it out, at least it's not an obscure prototype, and it is a different plane from the plans.


kozzm0 11-27-2009 11:55 PM

ok final hint before I reveal the answer: yes, it was, in fact, stolen from Dassault.

I guess the f-35 lovers didn't materialize but it's a good thing I didn't say anything bad about the f-22. Though I think it put all its eggs in the BVR basket too, at least as far as combat vs OVT planes is concerned. [ducks]

I considered posting the Viggen, actually, I like the fighters that can land on roads. More sensible than putting vtol on a plane and then still calling it a fighter.

Vulcan607 11-28-2009 04:44 PM

Northrop tiger II?

kozzm0 11-28-2009 05:09 PM

time's up, the plane I posted is the IAI Kfir. Mirage3 + stolen plans = Kfir. The Mirage 3's plans were stolen by the Mossad after France embargoed Israel. Israel added their own, better engine and their own avionics and a few other things.

Vulcan607 11-28-2009 05:13 PM

so now you know

Vulcan607 11-28-2009 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123313)
Ok, here is my next one.

This one is with it's wings removed
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?738492026

And here it is WITH wings. (Edited it to make it easier to see and to avoid Cheaters ;))
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?493372976

Thunderbird 2?

Soviet Ace 11-28-2009 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kozzm0 (Post 123563)
time's up, the plane I posted is the IAI Kfir. Mirage3 + stolen plans = Kfir. The Mirage 3's plans were stolen by the Mossad after France embargoed Israel. Israel added their own, better engine and their own avionics and a few other things.

Are you sure about that? I mean Mossad stealing France's blueprints of the Mirage 3. Because I remember reading somewhere, that since France was supplying Israel with planes, tanks, and weapons (before the US took over as the main contributor,) they gave the Israeli's the Mirage 3 because it was becoming outdated for the French Air Force. And also, that's how they got other Mirage's like the IV and another early Mirage (by buying them, and then suiting them up for their own uses, not stealing the prints).

Vulcan607 11-28-2009 05:28 PM

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...warrior/as.jpg
and another mass of strings and wings
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...arrior/sus.jpg

mattmanB182 11-28-2009 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 123572)

Shackelton?

Vulcan607 11-28-2009 06:51 PM

yes A.V.Roe Shackleton
now only my seaplane to go.

Spitfire23 11-28-2009 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123313)
Ok, here is my next one.

This one is with it's wings removed
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?738492026

And here it is WITH wings. (Edited it to make it easier to see and to avoid Cheaters ;))
http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?493372976

Sorry about that, strange because when i posted it, it was 2 seperate photos.

Ahhh well, here is the image that was supposed to be there, Give it a go ;)

http://sonicbomb.com/albums/album51/...ini_VVA_14.jpg

Soviet Ace 11-28-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123600)
Sorry about that, strange because when i posted it, it was 2 seperate photos.

Ahhh well, here is the image that was supposed to be there, Give it a go ;)

http://sonicbomb.com/albums/album51/...ini_VVA_14.jpg

Haha, you had me fooled for a moment there. BUT, you can't fool a Soviet Ace. :P

Anyway, the answer is a Bartini VVA-14 Long-Rage Seaplane. It was supposed to be able to take off from the water, VTOL style, but failed because of the engines or something? My Encyclopedia of Soviet Aircraft is always good. ;)

kozzm0 11-29-2009 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soviet Ace (Post 123569)
Are you sure about that? I mean Mossad stealing France's blueprints of the Mirage 3. Because I remember reading somewhere, that since France was supplying Israel with planes, tanks, and weapons (before the US took over as the main contributor,) they gave the Israeli's the Mirage 3 because it was becoming outdated for the French Air Force. And also, that's how they got other Mirage's like the IV and another early Mirage (by buying them, and then suiting them up for their own uses, not stealing the prints).

France did end up selling Mirage's to Israel, but at the time, Charles De Gaulle was refusing to sell them so they had to steal Mirage 3. It was being produced outside France, Switzerland if I remember right, and a Mossad agent managed to get ahold of several hundred copies of the design.

Wissam24 11-29-2009 01:55 AM

But that's not a funny name

Spitfire23 11-29-2009 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soviet Ace (Post 123625)
Haha, you had me fooled for a moment there. BUT, you can't fool a Soviet Ace. :P

Anyway, the answer is a Bartini VVA-14 Long-Rage Seaplane. It was supposed to be able to take off from the water, VTOL style, but failed because of the engines or something? My Encyclopedia of Soviet Aircraft is always good. ;)

Ahhh crap, i was hoping one of you russians didn't show up.

And yes that is correct and so is the information on it. God your good

Reminder to everyone: Dont bother posting russian planes, theres hardly any point, Right Soviet ;)

Soviet Ace 11-29-2009 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123692)
Ahhh crap, i was hoping one of you russians didn't show up.

And yes that is correct and so is the information on it. God your good

Reminder to everyone: Dont bother posting russian planes, theres hardly any point, Right Soviet ;)

Well I do have like 10+ books all about Soviet planes from 1920s-1991. I don't know them all off hand, but I'm sure if you post a soviet plane, I'll be sure to find it somewhere in one of my books. ;) I actually wish I had one of those VVA-14 sea planes. It would be SWEEEET. :D

Spitfire23 11-29-2009 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soviet Ace (Post 123695)
Well I do have like 10+ books all about Soviet planes from 1920s-1991. I don't know them all off hand, but I'm sure if you post a soviet plane, I'll be sure to find it somewhere in one of my books. ;) I actually wish I had one of those VVA-14 sea planes. It would be SWEEEET. :D

No bloody wonder! Your knowledge combined with 10+ books is enough for world domination.

And it really would be pretty amazing to own one of those, they look so unusual that most will think its a spacecraft :grin:

Soviet Ace 11-29-2009 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 123697)
No bloody wonder! Your knowledge combined with 10+ books is enough for world domination.

And it really would be pretty amazing to own one of those, they look so unusual that most will think its a spacecraft :grin:

LOL My knowledge, is those 10+ books. lol But its sinks in, so more knowledge can be given some room. :lol:

kozzm0 11-29-2009 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wissam24 (Post 123691)
But that's not a funny name

"Kfir" isn't a funny name?

I still don't even know how to pronounce it. There is a food called "kefir," but I don't know if it's pronounced like that, and even if it was, it would still sound funny.

Soviet Ace 11-29-2009 07:15 PM

Here's an interesting plane.

http://ram-home.com/ram-old/mig-8-1-sh2p243a.jpg

flynlion 11-29-2009 07:48 PM

MiG 8, also known as the "Duck".

Soviet Ace 11-29-2009 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 123833)
MiG 8, also known as the "Duck".

Cheater, looking at the URL. :P lol

flynlion 11-29-2009 08:32 PM

Nope, never saw the URL, but I did cheat a little. At first I thought it might be a very early Rutan design, from before he got into composites. Then I remembered who posted the picture and knew it had to be Russian :-P
So I did a google for "Soviet Canard" and there it was LoL

flynlion 11-29-2009 08:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Doesn't this one look fun?

Spitfire23 11-29-2009 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 123845)
Doesn't this one look fun?

It does indeed, a very sexy little plane i think.

Sandylowlead 11-30-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winny (Post 119939)
And here's my next one seeing as I got the 'flying dart' one...
http://i822.photobucket.com/albums/z...teryplane3.jpg

flying pancake^^

Sandylowlead 11-30-2009 03:00 PM

http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...0001745977.jpg
This one is at my work^^ The hint is it's a "Corben"

Robotic Pope 11-30-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandylowlead (Post 124019)
flying pancake^^

That pic is from WAAAY back in the thread and has since been reposted and answered on page 19.

Also Arn't Corben's kit planes. So every single plane is going to look slightly different? This one from the 30's.

Robotic Pope 11-30-2009 04:07 PM

This one for getting the Sea Hornet and cluing the Walrus.

http://i49.tinypic.com/2hyxpoh.jpg

dkwookie 11-30-2009 04:10 PM

That plane is from from Slipstream, flown to the sound of Then Jerichos Big Area
aka Optica OA7

Robotic Pope 11-30-2009 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkwookie (Post 124031)
That plane is from from Slipstream, flown to the sound of Then Jerichos Big Area
aka Optica OA7

Yup its the Optica, a weird plane designed for slowness lol. Your turn.

Houndstone Hawk 11-30-2009 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 122211)

Supermarine Attacker? Sorry just incase it's already been answered btw!

dkwookie 11-30-2009 04:58 PM

ok pretty easy one
http://www.world-war-2-planes.com/im...ado-Ar-232.jpg

Danny M NL 11-30-2009 05:28 PM

what, a luftwaffe plane I've never seen before?! I call hax!!!!

edit: oh, it's an arado 232, you really should change the name of the pics before you host them :)

Danny M NL 11-30-2009 05:39 PM

http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/picturesp/aa4.jpg

Vulcan607 11-30-2009 05:41 PM

Okay dont think this one will be too taxing on the the old grey matter
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...ewarrior/j.jpg



This one might be...
[IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...warrior/aa.jpg[/IMG]

Robotic Pope 11-30-2009 05:57 PM

That one is very easy, Jet Provost. Not sure about the other.

Danny, is that a Me262 prototype with a prop.

flynlion 11-30-2009 11:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I think Sandylowlead's is a Corben Babyace, an early "homebuilt" from the 1920's. You can still get plans and kits for 'em today, though it's very rare to see one with a radial engine nowadays. The one in the photo must be pretty old, and it still drips oil! Where do you work Sandy? Place looks pretty cool in the photo :cool:

Nobody wants to guess at mine? Hint: It's a homebuilt from the '70's.

Danny M NL 12-01-2009 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robotic Pope (Post 124079)

Danny, is that a Me262 prototype with a prop.

nope...

Panzergranate 12-01-2009 02:40 AM

Danny NL's is the Heinkel fighter, He-99, which was in competition with the Bf-109 for the role as principle Luftwaffe fighter, during the 1930's.

flynlion 12-02-2009 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 124174)
Danny NL's is the Heinkel fighter, He-99, which was in competition with the Bf-109 for the role as principle Luftwaffe fighter, during the 1930's.


Are you sure Panzer? The He-112 was a competitor with the Bf-109, and it was a tail-wheel plane. This one seems kinda odd with a nose gear up front sharing space with a big water-cooled engine, kinda wonder how it all fit. Maybe the nose wheel tucked up into the gap left by the inverted V? I can't find anything on the He-99 except that a few flew in Spain with the Condor Legion, no pictures. Now I'm curious to learn more about it....

P-51 12-02-2009 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 124072)

Is it a lightning prototype? P1.A or something? Maybe a Short SB.5?

Vulcan607 12-02-2009 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P-51 (Post 124662)
Is it a lightning prototype? P1.A or something? Maybe a Short SB.5?

sorry but no.
Its the first entry in the 1959 edition of the obserbers book of aircraft

flynlion 12-03-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 124694)
sorry but no.
Its the first entry in the 1959 edition of the obserbers book of aircraft

Well that certainly narrows it down LoL. To me it looks kinda like a Republic F-84 Thunderstreak, except the tail is wrong. What is it Vulcan?

Vulcan607 12-03-2009 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 124819)
Well that certainly narrows it down LoL. To me it looks kinda like a Republic F-84 Thunderstreak, except the tail is wrong. What is it Vulcan?

Aerfer Ariete
Italian Interceptor Figheter
Fitted with Rolls Royce engines
first flew march 27th 1958

Panzergranate 12-03-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flynlion (Post 124557)
Are you sure Panzer? The He-112 was a competitor with the Bf-109, and it was a tail-wheel plane. This one seems kinda odd with a nose gear up front sharing space with a big water-cooled engine, kinda wonder how it all fit. Maybe the nose wheel tucked up into the gap left by the inverted V? I can't find anything on the He-99 except that a few flew in Spain with the Condor Legion, no pictures. Now I'm curious to learn more about it....

I looks like the front wheel twists sideways, rather like on a P-36 and P-40, to fold up flat. The chances are that it could be one of the "Austerity / Desperation" built utility fighters towards the end of the war, when materials were in short supply.

Russia had the LaGG-1 and LaGG-3, Britain had the Miles M-20 amd Finland had the "Reckless" (A wooden copy of the Buffalo powered by an I-16 engine).

I find the "also flew" fighters and bombers more interesting than the more familiar fare.

The accounts of the many dogfights between HS-123 bi-plane fighters and Soviet I-15 bi-planes is one forgotten part of the 1941 invasion of Russia.

The Chinese ace, "Fatty" Chung, scored all his kills with the Vultee P-66 Vanguard, despite also flying the fast but clumsy P-43 Lancer, which the P-47 Thunderbolt is a bigger version of.

flynlion 12-03-2009 07:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 125016)
Aerfer Ariete
Italian Interceptor Figheter
Fitted with Rolls Royce engines
first flew march 27th 1958

Very cool :cool:
Here it is from a different angle, it looks much more "experimental" from the side.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.