![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
one variant of Catalina?
|
Quote:
|
Is that DeHavilland Hornet part of the question? Its one of my favourite fighters. I can tell that its a Hornet F mk3 too because it has the extended tail fin.
No idea about the bi plane though. Looks a bit like a Sunderland though so maybe its an earlier plane built by Shorts? |
Yeah De Haviland Sea Hornet
and no not a Shorts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well I had to look in a book to find out what it is. I guess thats cheating so I wont say what it is. I will give a clue though lol............ I am the Great Sea Eggman.
|
haha maybe not
|
Quote:
Excellent clueing there my friend! |
Congratulations
Supermarine Walrus and De Haviland Sea Hornet |
1 Attachment(s)
whats this?
|
something like a Do-305 or something like that
|
Quote:
close though |
Do-335 Pfeil
|
Do-335
Edit: shucks to slow |
|
convair xb 36?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
it's amazing to see what kinda PLanes came out in the 50'ies and 60'ies!
first they went all out Jet Propulled and later Models with Piston Engines came back?! |
Convair B-36 "Peacemaker"..... the piston engines suffered from overheating pronlems because of the pusher arrangement.
The jets were to assist take off and climbing to altitude when burdened with maximum payload. Once at the desired altitude they were shut down to conserve fuel. The aircraft had two seperate fule systems for each engine type. Some carried a Lockheed Goblin in tests or F-84 as a "parasite fighter" during the Korean War. |
Quote:
like with jets they had a higher stalling speed cos the prop pushes air over the wing faster than the air speed with a jet or pusher prop that doesnt happen |
Quote:
|
Whoever said B-36 first wins
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's an easy one just for Wissam24:
|
Quote:
;) |
vulcan's is a Sud se-210 caravelle, and Flynlion's is a traffic cop with a bad attitude and an ah-64 apache.
What's with the funny hat choppers like that one wear sometimes |
1 Attachment(s)
2 points for KozzmO :grin:
The funny hat is an electronics package carried by the "longbow' version of the Apache to snoop over terrain. I love that picture, though I suspect it is probably a photoshop. It was sent to me by a good buddy who was an Apache pilot in Iraq. Here's one of him giving his little girl a flying lesson: |
Quote:
The longbow will be in trouble if it encounters enemies with flying hammers. An aircraft with a funny hat deserves to be followed by one with a funny name: http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j2...ozz/plane3.jpg all identifying marks have been blurred out, so no use looking for them. |
is it a mirage maybe a rafel?
|
Mirage III?
And yeah, the Apache photo is a photoshop. On the other hand, this one isn't.. http://pacojonnes.files.wordpress.co...chool-sign.jpg Haha, bonus if you can name THAT plane |
Dassalt Mirage III
|
All good guesses but wrong... remember, funny name
For another hint, the production of this plane involved spies and stolen plans. The plane in the tree is a Huff-Daland Duster. Leaving the N-number visible is an invitation to cheat, so I did :D |
No idea but did you hear the F-35 plans were stolen?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's another one that is NOT a photoshop:
|
Quote:
But in the case of the plane above, ALL the plans were stolen, in one of the biggest spy operations of the 20th century. That should be enough of a dead giveaway. If anyone gets mad when they figure it out, at least it's not an obscure prototype, and it is a different plane from the plans. I think the f-35 plans may as well have been stolen, I believe it's an ill-conceived plane. The US DoD is always banking on multirole planes, the f-18 is a good one but the JSF as a plane that can do everything ends up with flaws in every department. In particular, the US has plenty of big carriers and it's not so vital to have a VTOL plane that can also fight, by adding the VTOL they had to weaken its fuselage to make the weight specs. So it's vulnerable to hits and flak, as currently designed, and it has no answer to the orbital-vectored thrust of the 4.5-generation Russian planes and upcoming PAK-FA. They expect air combat to be all about beyond-visual range and avionics in the future, they thought the same thing in the 60's and it didn't work. Except when it's not a big war. [crouches waiting for the swarm of f-35 defenders to attack] |
No idea from me. I am very intrigued however, so could you pm me the answer, and I publicly swear I won't reveal the answer
|
Were the plans stolen from Dassalt?
|
Quote:
I am biased because I love the F-22. A shame that our inept leadership cancelled the thing. |
Not sure if this one has been posted yet, I dont feel like going through all the pages. I am pretty sure I know who will guess this one. My bad on the poor quality. :(
http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...0182/guess.jpg http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/k...182/guess2.jpg |
Quote:
Edit: Oh and what looks like a model B-29 with russian markings |
Gotta agree about the F-35. What good is a VSTOL combat plane if you can't get fuel, ammo, MTX and other support to it in the field? Are they planning on flying all that stuff to it by helicopter or V-22?
Has the F-22 been cancelled or just reduced in number? Seems like there's a squadron in Langley that's already flying the thing. It is a bad assed plane, but I personally don't feel like paying for it. What's it going to fight that can't be dealt with by a few updated F-15s ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Edit: so it's my turn now right? |
Ok, here is my next one.
This one is with it's wings removed http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?738492026 And here it is WITH wings. (Edited it to make it easier to see and to avoid Cheaters ;)) http://www303.blibs.com/editor/worki...5272?493372976 |
Same picture.
|
One of teh saabs? viggen?
Quote:
|
That sounds like concord :grin:
Dassault dagger Quote:
|
ok final hint before I reveal the answer: yes, it was, in fact, stolen from Dassault.
I guess the f-35 lovers didn't materialize but it's a good thing I didn't say anything bad about the f-22. Though I think it put all its eggs in the BVR basket too, at least as far as combat vs OVT planes is concerned. [ducks] I considered posting the Viggen, actually, I like the fighters that can land on roads. More sensible than putting vtol on a plane and then still calling it a fighter. |
Northrop tiger II?
|
time's up, the plane I posted is the IAI Kfir. Mirage3 + stolen plans = Kfir. The Mirage 3's plans were stolen by the Mossad after France embargoed Israel. Israel added their own, better engine and their own avionics and a few other things.
|
so now you know
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...warrior/as.jpg
and another mass of strings and wings http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...arrior/sus.jpg |
Quote:
|
yes A.V.Roe Shackleton
now only my seaplane to go. |
Quote:
Ahhh well, here is the image that was supposed to be there, Give it a go ;) http://sonicbomb.com/albums/album51/...ini_VVA_14.jpg |
Quote:
Anyway, the answer is a Bartini VVA-14 Long-Rage Seaplane. It was supposed to be able to take off from the water, VTOL style, but failed because of the engines or something? My Encyclopedia of Soviet Aircraft is always good. ;) |
Quote:
|
But that's not a funny name
|
Quote:
And yes that is correct and so is the information on it. God your good Reminder to everyone: Dont bother posting russian planes, theres hardly any point, Right Soviet ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And it really would be pretty amazing to own one of those, they look so unusual that most will think its a spacecraft :grin: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still don't even know how to pronounce it. There is a food called "kefir," but I don't know if it's pronounced like that, and even if it was, it would still sound funny. |
|
MiG 8, also known as the "Duck".
|
Quote:
|
Nope, never saw the URL, but I did cheat a little. At first I thought it might be a very early Rutan design, from before he got into composites. Then I remembered who posted the picture and knew it had to be Russian :-P
So I did a google for "Soviet Canard" and there it was LoL |
1 Attachment(s)
Doesn't this one look fun?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/l...0001745977.jpg
This one is at my work^^ The hint is it's a "Corben" |
Quote:
Also Arn't Corben's kit planes. So every single plane is going to look slightly different? This one from the 30's. |
|
That plane is from from Slipstream, flown to the sound of Then Jerichos Big Area
aka Optica OA7 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ok pretty easy one
http://www.world-war-2-planes.com/im...ado-Ar-232.jpg |
what, a luftwaffe plane I've never seen before?! I call hax!!!!
edit: oh, it's an arado 232, you really should change the name of the pics before you host them :) |
|
Okay dont think this one will be too taxing on the the old grey matter
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...ewarrior/j.jpg This one might be... [IMG]http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/b...warrior/aa.jpg[/IMG] |
That one is very easy, Jet Provost. Not sure about the other.
Danny, is that a Me262 prototype with a prop. |
1 Attachment(s)
I think Sandylowlead's is a Corben Babyace, an early "homebuilt" from the 1920's. You can still get plans and kits for 'em today, though it's very rare to see one with a radial engine nowadays. The one in the photo must be pretty old, and it still drips oil! Where do you work Sandy? Place looks pretty cool in the photo :cool:
Nobody wants to guess at mine? Hint: It's a homebuilt from the '70's. |
Quote:
|
Danny NL's is the Heinkel fighter, He-99, which was in competition with the Bf-109 for the role as principle Luftwaffe fighter, during the 1930's.
|
Quote:
Are you sure Panzer? The He-112 was a competitor with the Bf-109, and it was a tail-wheel plane. This one seems kinda odd with a nose gear up front sharing space with a big water-cooled engine, kinda wonder how it all fit. Maybe the nose wheel tucked up into the gap left by the inverted V? I can't find anything on the He-99 except that a few flew in Spain with the Condor Legion, no pictures. Now I'm curious to learn more about it.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its the first entry in the 1959 edition of the obserbers book of aircraft |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Italian Interceptor Figheter Fitted with Rolls Royce engines first flew march 27th 1958 |
Quote:
Russia had the LaGG-1 and LaGG-3, Britain had the Miles M-20 amd Finland had the "Reckless" (A wooden copy of the Buffalo powered by an I-16 engine). I find the "also flew" fighters and bombers more interesting than the more familiar fare. The accounts of the many dogfights between HS-123 bi-plane fighters and Soviet I-15 bi-planes is one forgotten part of the 1941 invasion of Russia. The Chinese ace, "Fatty" Chung, scored all his kills with the Vultee P-66 Vanguard, despite also flying the fast but clumsy P-43 Lancer, which the P-47 Thunderbolt is a bigger version of. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Here it is from a different angle, it looks much more "experimental" from the side. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.