Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=132)
-   -   things you would like to see in a patch (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=8546)

G M 08-01-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave1978 (Post 86263)
ONly the one thing for me and thats re-mapping the controls. The controls on Over-G are perfect and this game needs to be the same.

The rudder needs to be on the triggers, throttle on the shoulder buttons. This leaves the right stick for looking around and not having to fumble around and click down on, also eliminates throttle mistakes when trying to look around.

yes, Over G's controls were pretty good, but I'm happy with BoP controls if the sticks were round the other way. I do agree about the looking around though.

BadKarmaSutra96 08-01-2009 07:08 PM

I hate Over-G's control scheme for the same reasons that you love it. Why, you ask? It's because it made it so that you cannot use a joystick controller for the game. Then again, had Over-G had fully user mappable control settings I would still be playing Over-G to this day. (I lied, sometimes I still do play it but I don't get to enjoy my saitek while playing it)

G M 08-01-2009 08:07 PM

When it comes to flight sims controls on a pad it's a very persnal opinion every one likes it different, I don't see why you can't choose what does what, you would think developers would of learnt this by now.

BadKarmaSutra96 - "Then again, had Over-G had fully user mappable control settings I would still be playing Over-G to this day."

My point proven, I was pretty happy with Over G like I said before, I would say the best control layout for a pad would be Battlestations midway/pacific witch is very like BoP's but with the sticks around the other way so perfect.
But it's down to opinions = fully mappable please.

guiltyspark 08-01-2009 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Goalie_94 (Post 86273)
Wait, i never knew it was gone?

there is no p51 cockpit in the game, its a p47

Camo-234 08-01-2009 08:45 PM

I wonder if they are going to fix that. It seems strange being in a P-51 and having a P-47 cockpit.

guiltyspark 08-01-2009 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camo-234 (Post 86318)
I wonder if they are going to fix that. It seems strange being in a P-51 and having a P-47 cockpit.

well its a dev thing , most likely there are alot of planes in the game and not enough dev time/funds to model every one

so i bet a few planes will share cockpits

the only thing that confuses me is why the p51 , if anything i would want to put that as a priority over other planes

Camo-234 08-01-2009 10:37 PM

I think they just chose at random which planes to switch cockpits.

David603 08-01-2009 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guiltyspark (Post 86341)
well its a dev thing , most likely there are alot of planes in the game and not enough dev time/funds to model every one

so i bet a few planes will share cockpits

the only thing that confuses me is why the p51 , if anything i would want to put that as a priority over other planes

It was probably just human error, or they wanted to use the Mustang in the demo but its cockpit wasn't finished yet so they picked the nearest match.

guiltyspark 08-01-2009 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David603 (Post 86347)
It was probably just human error, or they wanted to use the Mustang in the demo but its cockpit wasn't finished yet so they picked the nearest match.

its not , anton confirmed it

Camo-234 08-02-2009 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guiltyspark (Post 86348)
its not , anton confirmed it

Its true. Just look at the thread about the P-51 cockpit.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.