Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - The unfortunate turth

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - The unfortunate turth (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=31817)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 420580)

The unfortunate truth here is that no mater what 1C does there will be a group that is not happy.

What`s strange is that those are the same people that have been whining for a year now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi (Post 420559)

Err doesn't the beta patch contain changes to the flight model, some of which already have the Rather Annoyed Force up in arms ;)

Yeah they're all pissed off that they won't have a plane that out-turns, out-climbs, and out-speeds the Luftwaffe any more.

Anyways, 1C have stated more than once that the flight models are wrong above 7000m and that it won't be fixed until they get more of our money.

Quote:

do not allow us to minimize the margin of error at altitudes about 7 km (21,000 ft) where most aircraft begin to perform worse than their real-life counterparts. Fixing this requires more extensive code rework and will therefore only appear with the upcoming sequel

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadTommy (Post 420630)

Very true indeed, mainly because whatever they do it is sub standard.

Case in point ^^

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrel79 (Post 420612)

I going to reserve my judgement until the FINAL release version of this patch comes out.

+1...even if I become to turn pessimist :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by carguy_ (Post 420644)

What`s strange is that those are the same people that have been whining for a year now.

Roger that which leads me to belive it has more to do with thier PC than CoD

The truth is this. Made last year.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBsFk...feature=relmfu

Anything else better? I think not.

Keep up thje excellent work Developers:grin:

Best Regards,
MB_Avro.

Seems a bit backwards to me. If they expect more money then releasing CLoD in such a state would have a rather adverse effect on that idea.

I for one, won't be purchasing BoM, at least not until it has been out for several months and has been scrutinized by the community, or they get CLoD working as intended.

Whiskey

Ace, even though i don't want to, i'm becoming increasingly despondent now myself.

At some point potential has to be realised into actuality.

From my point of view, i could live with everything else if the fm's were good, but they seem to be going backwards

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 420665)

Roger that which leads me to belive it has more to do with thier PC than CoD

Fair point, but how is it that 1C can't write software that runs equally well on recommended spec machines? Lots of other developers manage it quite well.

Beta patch it may be, but unfortunately it appears for most to be a step backwards. I am having more CTD now than I was was pre patch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fruitbat (Post 420673)

Don't get me wrong.. it is depressing that more of these folks can not get the CoD to work with thier systems.. That means less targets online which is bad for all of us.

But stop and remember.. This is a alpha/beta patch that 1C themselfs admited day one has issues (disabled feature) and they released it with the sole purpose of getting feedback from all the users to help them nail down the bugs faster! You know that thing alot of the whiners have been whining for.. And now they got thier chance to be part of the solution and all they way to do is sit back and pretend they didn't hear/read the part about this being an alpha/beta patch and want to pass judgement as if this was the final patch and 1C guarnteed that everything was fixxed!

In short..

What part of alpha/beta patch do these people not understand?

If you don't want to help out by reporting bugs.. than don't DL alpha/beta patches and WAIT for the FINAL patch

IT IS THAT SIMPLE!!