Official Fulqrum Publishing forum - Friday update and discussions 2011-02-25

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)

- - Friday update and discussions 2011-02-25 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18904)

Nice picture and Yes keep the Calander girls.

I must say that my favourite screenshot so far must be this...
...showing a nice blend regarding the brightness of the paint-job and markings.
It makes such a big difference when there two are matched!

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...224_130618.jpg

Translated by google:

Quote:

Re: Friday's update 25/02/2011
Creatures will not increase. They are acceptable human growth. If they do more, they will give us something to fall through so the geometry, especially with different versions of the clothes that you can put on yourself.

In life, clothes rumpled, in the game there. They sat down in a thick jacket Irwin, shoulders crawls through the glass. Put on his cap - it is half in the lamp.

The only way to make a man in Messer, to shoulder a millimeter of glass is to select your choice of Uniform and make it completely static without animation. In my opinion that there is - the lesser of two evils. Much smaller. All within the acceptable. He was a meter 68.

http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthrea...=1#post1555501

Don't know if it has been posted so far. Pilot size 1.68m sound ok to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks (Post 229155)

Translated by google:

http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthrea...=1#post1555501

Don't know if it has been posted so far. Pilot size 1.68m sound ok to me.

As presumed, thanks:grin:

I'm 1,97, wanna play basketball?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks (Post 229155)

Translated by google:

http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthrea...=1#post1555501

Don't know if it has been posted so far. Pilot size 1.68m sound ok to me.

Yes, but he looks scaled down from a larger figure, rather than a short chap who would have different proportions and larger head.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blakduk (Post 228869)

Regarding the pictures of the stabiliser shadows on the 109's- they were not fixed completely to the tail section. They could be tilted to trim the aircraft- as i understand it they were not adjustable in-flight, and could only be set by groundcrew. I think the shadow gap is overdone but it is not apparent on the models of the other planes (such as the Spits and Hurricanes).
The problem of floating elements on smaller parts such as the exhaust covers and aerial masts is definitely there, as illustrated by the excellent examples posted by Major_setback, but the 109 stabilisers shadow gaps is partly due to the design of the real aircraft and therefore the true-to-life computer model.

The tilting stabilizer was actually the trim control, adjustable from the cockpit. The tabs for the rudder and aileron were adjustable on the ground only iirc with pliers. I've been trying to find a picture that shows any kind of actual gap, but I've had no luck, it must've been pretty tight.

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback (Post 229590)

Yes, but he looks scaled down from a larger figure, rather than a short chap who would have different proportions and larger head.

I'm 1.69m. I do not suffer from dwarfism. As a matter of fact that is only slightly below modern average height for a male at 1.72m. I don't know how you figure that slightly below average height is a "midget." A "midget" tends to be just at or above 1.2m.

the man inside the plane was too broad shoulders is very disproportionate.
broad shoulders.
small head
you should see him naked without a uniform to make a careful analysis.
HUMAN PROPORTION
http://www.abruzzocultura.it/abruzzo...Vitruviano.jpg
http://arsludica.org/wp-content/uplo...04/snap154.jpg
flight machine LEONARDO
http://www.leonardo3.net/leonardo/da...%20volanti.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback (Post 229101)

I think the weathering and also the pilot size look very good here.