Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Performance threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=195)
-   -   Can't post copyright material, but PC Pilot worth a read this-month re.performance (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=25543)

tintifaxl 08-22-2011 08:49 AM

Did they state at what resolution they were doing the tests with? Which ATI driver version? Some basic info is missing here.

Vengeanze 08-22-2011 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tintifaxl (Post 326034)
Did they state at what resolution they were doing the tests with? Which ATI driver version? Some basic info is missing here.

Res 1920 x 1280 according to previous post...
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...23&postcount=7

tintifaxl 08-22-2011 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vengeanze (Post 326043)
Res 1920 x 1280 according to previous post...
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...23&postcount=7

Looks like I need to brush up my reading skills ... I read that post, I'm sure I did.

Vengeanze 08-22-2011 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tintifaxl (Post 326045)
Looks like I need to brush up my reading skills ... I read that post, I'm sure I did.

If people read right and used the forum search then I wouldn't get the chance to shine and help others so...thank you. :-D

macro 09-02-2011 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mysticpuma (Post 325723)
Nine-Lives posted this:

For those who can't access the mag this is a very brief summary of what they found.

This is no substitute for buying the magazine though as it's excellent.

Basically they tried various settings and posted the max/average/min frame rates:

(This is with Corei7 920 over-clocked @4GHz, Radeon HD6870, 12GB RAM at 1920x1280 rez.)

ATI users take note.....There is some stuff about the Radeon clock speeds which I won't go into here as you need to read them for yourself to fix a bug with them-the frames below are with the bug fixed using ATI tray tools to lock the clocks.

1. Stock frames with settings 'High' with forest to 'low', texture qual to 'original', grass disabled, AA, AE, SSAO and Vsync all to 'off' - frames 13/54/117

2. Stock frames with everything maxed out 'very high' but grass 'off' - frames 7/46/107

3. As 2 above with AA turned off in game but turned on in graphics card control panel 8x - frames 10/51/117

4. As 3 above with Vsync off in game but on in graphics card control panel - frames 13/52/119

5. As 4 above with texture in game changed from 'high' to 'original' - frames 15/52/117

6. As 5 above but with AF enabled in the graphics card control panel set to 8x instead of application controlled. - frames 19/58/145

7. As 6 above but with the cards AF set to 4x. - frames 21/63/144

So as you can see the minimum frames have gone from the stock 7 to 21 and average 46 to 63.

Of course your own pc set up may vary these results. And grass is off so it's not going to look as good when sat on the ground but as grass and forest seem to be the biggest frame rate killer you may think this is worthwhile.

Hope this helps. It will be interesting to see what you get with these changes. :cool:

dont mean to dig up an old thread if this is but i found this last night, follows the intructions and it gave me a noticeable improvement even though i had everything on low/off before (except effect, couldnt do without planes going down with no smoke...)

dont get how but it improved performance and looks better as well.

the most noticable thing i had was when i got a plane to start flaming the smoke effects really slowed down my framerate when i tried to fly through the smoke (most of the time as soon as i got good hits) , its much smoother now

just thought id register share this in case others thought it wouldnt help, its worth a try

my comp specs (no making jokes pls i know im behind the times)

windows 7 64bit
amd dual core 2.8ghz
4 gig ram
9600gt 1gb card

Vengeanze 09-02-2011 06:35 PM

I bought the zine to read about the "miracle" but it's all about turning off AA/AF in game and turning grass off and put textures to high (from original).
No news to me as I've benchmarked ALL variant of settings.

capt. windh 09-03-2011 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macro (Post 330150)
dont mean to dig up an old thread if this is but i found this last night, follows the intructions and it gave me a noticeable improvement even though i had everything on low/off before (except effect, couldnt do without planes going down with no smoke...)

dont get how but it improved performance and looks better as well.

the most noticable thing i had was when i got a plane to start flaming the smoke effects really slowed down my framerate when i tried to fly through the smoke (most of the time as soon as i got good hits) , its much smoother now

just thought id register share this in case others thought it wouldnt help, its worth a try

my comp specs (no making jokes pls i know im behind the times)

windows 7 64bit
amd dual core 2.8ghz
4 gig ram
9600gt 1gb card

None shall laugh at these specs. I have pretty much the same, and I´m proud. :grin:

Anyhow, I bought a copy today and had to put things waaay down low and the res. too, in order to get a fair performance (which is everything in flying..)

I´ll be trying out these procedures tomorrow.


My specs...



Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 (2.66GHz)
Win7 x64 (SP1), DirectX 9.0c NVIDIA Geforce 8800GT 512Mb, 2Gb RAM, 2,8Tb HD


(I´ll be buying more RAM during the fall, and more stuff when I get the funds.. I still have a decent motherboard which can take all the high end stuff..)


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.