Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   A tool that could help evaluate BOB COD objectively (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=24243)

nearmiss 07-01-2011 10:34 PM

The purpose is to give the developer some idea of how the patches are working for us with our individual system specs.

There are many tools available Open source. Maybe best, if there was some consensus on a tool everyone can use and discusses BOB COD performance issues.

The system spec isn't bad either, but it does require some further investigation by the developer to find issues.

I do see some some darn good video releases, which tells me everyone doesn't have the issues others describe as unworkable.

Some members keep on their whine, whle others are doing well with the COD. There are reasons for the differences. If there is some way to give the developers competent information, apart from whines, I am for that.

Ze-Jamz 07-01-2011 10:36 PM

As I said be quiet..

Again you obviously don't know what your talking about and have basically said the same thing again so il follow you...

Win7 gimmick benchmarking system will cause more issues than fixing them due to the way it diagnoses your hardware and gives priorities to certain combinations which have no real world meaning..

So please listen to what I said the first time, insult me all you like and if you think I'm whining well then...fair play I don't know what else to say.

Now run along and don't bother me again

zoopyzook 07-01-2011 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nearmiss (Post 304798)
The purpose is to give the developer some idea of how the patches are working for us with our individual system specs.

There are many tools available Open source. Maybe best, if there was some consensus on a tool everyone can use and discusses BOB COD performance issues.

The system spec isn't bad either, but it does require some further investigation by the developer to find issues.

I do see some some darn good video releases, which tells me everyone doesn't have the issues others describe as unworkable.

Some members keep on their whine, whle others are doing well with the COD. There are reasons for the differences. If there is some way to give the developers competent information, apart from whines, I am for that.


Win 7 Experience index isn't really a benchmark why not try 3D Mark 11 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/

This is the industry standard after-all

Ze-Jamz 07-01-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoopyzook (Post 304802)
Win 7 Experience index isn't really a benchmark why not try 3D Mark 11 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/

This is the industry standard after-all

Or 3D Mark vantage as it doenst need such a high tech system to get half decent results, it allows you to test things easier amongst diff systems

3D mark 11 is cool and and a great program but for me it needs just a bit too much to run properly and get decent scores/running if you get me drift :)

Orpheus 07-01-2011 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 304799)
As I said be quiet..

Again you obviously don't know what your talking about and have basically said the same thing again so il follow you...

Win7 gimmick benchmarking system will cause more issues than fixing them due to the way it diagnoses your hardware and gives priorities to certain combinations which have no real world meaning..

So please listen to what I said the first time, insult me all you like and if you think I'm whining well then...fair play I don't know what else to say.

Now run along and don't bother me again


I give up - there's no reasoning with chumps. All the OP was trying to do was be helpful, if you wanna puke all over that go right ahead.

zoopyzook 07-01-2011 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 304803)
Or 3D Mark vantage as it doenst need such a high tech system to get half decent results, it allows you to test things easier amongst diff systems

3D mark 11 is cool and and a great program but for me it needs just a bit too much to run properly and get decent scores/running if you get me drift :)

but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05 :grin:

ATAG_Dutch 07-01-2011 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoopyzook (Post 304805)
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05 :grin:

Anyone tried 4BKevin 62?

Sorry, it's that beer again.:(

Ze-Jamz 07-01-2011 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orpheus (Post 304804)
I give up - there's no reasoning with chumps. All the OP was trying to do was be helpful, if you wanna puke all over that go right ahead.

You still here?

Ze-Jamz 07-01-2011 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoopyzook (Post 304805)
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05 :grin:

Lol, 3d mark5 was a good benchmark program too..

Heaven is a good free easy to use program, you tried that?

Orpheus 07-01-2011 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 304807)
You still here?

Apparently so. So far I'm the only person that's actually contributed to the thread instead of whining because you all prefer a different benchmark.

Thought of trying that? You know, contributing? No, of course not.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.