No it's not!

I did a mistake trying to help this guy in the past. Some people just do not want to do anything to make the game running on their system. It is more rewarding for them just to feel pity for themselves in public. They definitely need a manly hug or what do you call it in English.

Come on man, clear your cache (as in "drink your coffee") and try again...:rolleyes:

Actually if we put it too a vote i would have to go with IL2 1946 with the UP 3.0 and Wide screen support Mods, as far as the best all around WWII flight sim today :)

Just discovered this mod lately waiting for CLOD to catch up and i must say it has brought this 1946 back to life for me and i find myself spending 5 plus hours a pop doing mission after mission again like the good old days :)

Cheers

What widescreen mods? There is only this "Ecran wide" mod that makes user interface widescreen, but for actual gameplay there is still only (very buggy) San's FOV changer. Because even with Ecran wide mod, the actual gameplay (not menus) chops off the top and bottom of the 4:3 picture, not adds to it at the sides.

Hmmm... for IL2FB ???

No, real three times more view than normal.
But for this it is better to have 4:3 monitors ;)

Example, 3-4 years ago, 3072x768 resolution (left view 1024x768 + centre view 1024x768 + right view 1024x768)
You need to turn the left and right monitors to an angle towards you in order to have a realistic feeling (in the photo they are straitened up in order to take the picture).
http://www.stoimenos.com/temp/TripleHead2Go_01.JPG

and you have an amazing field of view (look to the right)
http://www.stoimenos.com/temp/perfect8800.jpg

I sincerely hope that Luthier will manage to give us 3renders view in CoD soon, otherwise this will be the reason for me to drop this game...

But I have no reason to complain with CoD (except the stupid head restriction in gunsight mode in the Bf109 which made me switch to Spitfires
after seven years flying for the "Dark side"), my SLI works fine and I have around 70fps at 3072x resolution, sound works fine (yes I know,
many complain about it but I never lost it), graphics and damage model are awesome and the rest, is patience.
"Patience" means waiting for the next generations of GPUs to come out so that I can have some power to play this game in high settings.
Do not dream about code optimizations, the game is huge and it requires ressources! If you want to see what t really can do, go to to Tuckie's post
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=24093
and download the 1080HD version of his video (it is 340Mb ;) ) and watch to the end to get a taste of the graphics detail this game has! AWESOME!


So coming back to the initial post, 50bucks is a waste of money, I am sure it is for you (after the thousand bucks you paid for your hardware).
You are not worth to own the game and I believe it should be forbidden to sell this game to people like you because you lack understanding
and appreciation for the things you have and have no idea for the work people have to do in order for you to enjoy what you get.
I am even surprised that you put your time to overclock your CPU to 3702MHz or probably you had someone else do it for you...

~S~

it doesn't feel good ... and yea i am winning because if this is the new standard i would say take a look to Rise of flight .

a good example how it can work with nice graphics good sound and excellent environment .


i am just disappointed that's all .

I started up rof to check out the Bristol fighter and I was surprised at how bland the landscape looks compared to cod. And I like rof but graphically I think cod has the edge, sounds and performance is a different matter though :D :(

This is a joke right? Comparing CLODs ugly neon landscape (which lacks proper AA btw) with that of ROF?

Mate you clearly need your eyes testing everyone talks about how pastel coloured the ground is, your the only one that has mentioned a neon landscape.