Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Stable Patch or Features/Content Poll (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=23279)

Fragal 05-25-2011 10:33 AM

Being selfish and voting for more content too , latest patch has solved the majority of issues for me happily flying online quite well now.

Redroach 05-25-2011 11:30 AM

I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."

Sauf 05-25-2011 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fragal (Post 288658)
Being selfish and voting for more content too , latest patch has solved the majority of issues for me happily flying online quite well now.

+1

Ali Fish 05-25-2011 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redroach (Post 288675)
I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."

what he said ! +1

Blackdog_kt 05-25-2011 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz (Post 288656)
personally my performance now is OK but as a whole community wise

Performance/stability
FM corrections
Added content

Pretty much runs ok for me too, on a two year old PC no less, but i'll go along and agree with this, even adding a couple more:

1) Performance/stability

2) FM/DM corrections if and where they are needed

3) Gameplay related issues like the gyrocompass on the Ju88 or the inconsistent control logic between different aircraft: should our controllers correspond to a function of the in-cockpit controller (enrich mixture) or a position (mixture lever forward, whatever that means for the plane you're flying)?
Currently it's one way in some aircraft (eg, the in the G50 you move the throttle forward for more power and the in-cockpit animated throttle moves back like it was in the real fighter, the game controller corresponds to a function/effect) and the other way in others (the mixture lever on all RAF aircraft is reversed and we have to use it the same way, in this case mixtur commands correspond to the lever positions and depending on how these levers are set-up in the aircraft we get the final effect). It's also completely mixed up in some, like the Tiger Moth and the DH-prop Hurricane.

4) Amended Documentation to teach people what to do with those gameplay features.
There's a bunch of stuff that people cry "bug/broken/etc" about, which are actually realistic limitations of the aircraft and intentional features.

True, people bring all their IL2:1946 gaming habits and expect the new thing to work the same, but we can't really blame them when documentation doesn't go a bit more in depth on the main points of interest that generate most of the confusion.

What we can blame them for is not searching the forum for previous answers and not ever testing anything for themselves, this is appropriate and acceptable :-P

5) Extra content


There's no real reason to have extra content before the current content works as intended. The majority of players can't manage a radial engined aircraft or level bomb yet or change skins or save loadouts, etc etc....if they could, they would be busy enough enjoying what's there and this would buy the devs the needed time to work on more content.

Let's fix and document what's needed to have the complete list of currently available aircraft operating in they way they should be, then we can start adding more stuff. ;)

carguy_ 05-25-2011 01:23 PM

The poll is flawed, since the idea is to bring both to the table simultaneously.

Besides that, since the 2nd official patch, most of the PCs seem to run the game fine. I know I didn`t get more than two CDTs in a 12 hour CoD usage. We need the additional content. First should be multiplayer scene to recreate the IL2 coops, then maybe we should get some ships to sink and then maybe new planes.

ATAG_Dutch 05-25-2011 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redroach (Post 288675)
I can't vote because the option that should receive at least 95% of the votes is not there: "both."

Agreed, although if there was an option for total bug elimination, I'd go for that.

Sound bugs, stripes of land in the water bugs, stripes of water in the land bugs, props hidden by clouds bugs, big mauve rectangle in the landscape bugs, clouds and their shadows flickering annoyingly bugs, grass poking through your wing bugs, white dots from vehicle locations showing through your plane bugs, and bugs , bugs, bugs etc.

Oh, and an option to hide info boxes without deleting them altogether, because I did this and even if I reconfigure them all and save, they don't reappear on relaunching the game. But then I could've missed something.:grin:

nearmiss 05-25-2011 02:48 PM

There are disabled features in COD that can be enabled as the patches for a workable COD are released as well. So any poll response really doesn't make any information of value to anyone.

In other words, the poll has no value... sorry bout that.

JG53Frankyboy 05-25-2011 02:55 PM

well, IF all the already included content would work or could be used properly, we would have a hell of a game..................long way to go !

Wolf_Rider 05-25-2011 03:17 PM

strip it down and put it on go jacks

1. fix the body
2. paint the thing
3. fix the suspension
4. fix the engine
5. fix the drive train
6. fix the steering

then

6. fix the interior

after that

7. run her with pride


everything in order chaps... there's a lot to be fixed


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.