Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   "Wings" Of Prey (PC). Watchout Oleg! (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=11817)

Feuerfalke 12-15-2009 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdMan (Post 128520)
screenshots are better than anything I've seen from BoB...:-P

Maybe that is because you have a different idea of what it should look like?
Probably more cinema-flight-experience than sitting in a real plane?

It may also be related to the fact that BoP has already been released for consoles and is simply ported for PCs, while BoB is still WIP?


Yes, it looks nice, but nice and realistic sometimes are two different things.

13th Hsqn Protos 12-15-2009 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feuerfalke (Post 128538)
Maybe that is because you have a different idea of what it should look like?
Probably more cinema-flight-experience than sitting in a real plane?


Yes, it looks nice, but nice and realistic sometimes are two different things.

:rolleyes:

As someone who does sit in/fly real planes from time to time = Wings of Prey terrain is both of a MUCH higher quality, and also significantly more realistic as to scale. Nothing wrong with pointing that out. WoP have done a great job in this area and deserve credit.

Feuerfalke 12-15-2009 08:02 AM

Interesting.

I rarely experience vignette borders in my field of view when flying and I rarely see brown-yellowish atmospheric fog.

http://www.simhq.com/_air13/wingsofp...7_original.jpg


And a Ka-20 sight, not moving on a P-51D5?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP7Xn...eature=related

13th Hsqn Protos 12-15-2009 08:26 AM

Attacking shading and color pallete 'style' choices ????

Your right ..... this is much more realistic :rolleyes:

Exactly the view when flying for real at say 700m ......... NOT!

Don't hate dude. WoP did a good job with terrain. No one has done better - not even O-man.

http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/grab0101.jpg



Feuerfalke 12-15-2009 08:58 AM

You are truly amazing!

Completely forgetting that the shot from BoB is very early WIP, not even BETA!!!, yet criticizing every little thing you see.

And at the very same time you stand there completely blinded by some overbombastic graphics effects completely disregarding optical, physical and historical realism. Ridiculous, simply ridiculous.

Maybe you should check out HAWX as well, go for action games and forget about realistic simulations at all? You won't be satisfied by BoB if you think that these Hollywood-Effects are realistic.

13th Hsqn Protos 12-15-2009 09:16 AM

.... and You are truly blinded.

You can' t give credit to some talented map makers and graphics artists. Not to mention the people who optimized the engine for super smooth play and stability ect ect ..... ect


Its truly beautiful work! Not to everyone's taste but that makes the technical accomplishment no less.

Competition is good. Embrace.

Personally I dream of competing sims. Let them each do their best.

We as simmers can only benefit.

** I will leave you to your personal attacks, going soaring today :-)

Feuerfalke 12-15-2009 09:59 AM

Actually, I never ever said it doesn't look nice. Infact, I did so numerous times before. Feel free to use the search-function to confirm this.
So your personal opinion about me doesn't really fit and it's simply not the point as I would support you 100% if you'd say that it looks fantastic and nice - though it is not realistic.

But you posted that WoP/BoP looks better, more realistic, with better textures, ground- and effects-modeling than BoB ever will and that has nothing to do with admiring great artwork, as you just claimed you do in your last post. ;)

csThor 12-15-2009 10:20 AM

A pretty face can hide a hideously ugly soul ... WOP was always meant to be an action game and therefore it isn't competition for SoW. Apples and oranges. :rolleyes:

zakkandrachoff 12-15-2009 10:22 AM

i can´t bealive the machine example for run this sim:

Minimal System Requirements:

Processor: Intel Pentium 4 3200MHz
RAM: 1024 Mb
Graphic card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 256 Mb or ATI Radeon X1650 256 Mb
HDD: 10 Gb free disk space
OS: Microsoft Windows XP SP3, DirectX 9.0c.
Soundcard, DirectX compatible
Internet connection: 56 kb/s
Keyboard, mouse

Recommended System Requirements:

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 2400 MHz
RAM: 2048 Mb
Graphic card: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 512 Mb or ATI Radeon 4850 512 Mb.
HDD: 10 Gb free disk space
OS: Microsoft Windows XP SP3 with DirectX 9.0c / Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 / Microsoft Windows 7
Sound card: DirectX compatible with support 5.1
Internet connection: 512 Kb/s
Keyboard, mouse, joystick


http://www.airwargame.com/eng/game/

My old Quad 9.400 2.66 will still functional and maybe, maybe not be obsolete when Storm Of War will release.:cool:

the simulation is very similar that il-2 i read and weather are in some point, very basic. buth the graphic terrain are nice.

nicy 162

http://www.airwargame.com/upload/ima...A-2_eng_06.jpg

Foo'bar 12-15-2009 11:04 AM

Way too much bump at the plane's hull ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.