Clouds/smoke/dust/fog
 

Three ideas for some patch in the future:

1) Multiple cloud layers, which can be defined in the QMB/FMB. Ideally, you should be able to set base height for each layer, as well as maximum top and bottom level, degree of opaqueness, percentage of cover and rain/snow effects. For example, you could, say, set 90% cloud cover from 300 meters to 2,000 meters with light rain, with clear skies above that to 10,000 meters where you encounter wispy clouds 20% coverage, with peaks up to 12,000 meters. Fog is modeled by creating low level full cover semi-opaque clouds.

2) Placeable clouds/dust/smoke/etc. In the FMB, you could place areas of cloud/whatever on the map, as defined above. By changing the color of the clouds you could get dust clouds (like sandstorms or those generated by big desert battles) or massive areas of smoke (caused by massive fires on the ground, or the pollution which hung over all big cities in the days when most heat and power was generated using coal).

3) The degree of dust kicked up by aircraft/vehicles varies depending on weather, map and surface. For example, a plane taking off from a concrete runway in moist temperate conditions isn't likely to kick up much dust, while a plane taking off from a sandy landing strip is likely to produce huge clouds of the stuff.

Dear DAIDALOS TEAM hi i tink the FIAT CR42 back not have a just dimension and measuring.
loock whit attenction this photo.
Attachment 3987
Attachment 3988
the hump back according to my analysis is very wide and very high.
this is original photo.

Attachment 3989
Attachment 3990
Attachment 3991

profile cr 42
Attachment 3992
Attachment 3993
Attachment 3994

flyable B25 H??
 

hi all is there any chance to have the B25 H flyable using the B25 J cockpit in the 4.10 update?? the cockpits must have been the same :)

To my knowledge there were differences between the two types so the answer must be no.

to bad about B25H maybe a flyable "ju88c" ;)

Attachment 3995

wrong desine please daidalos team corect the just desine of _FIAT cr 42

The one major difference was the lack of dual controls which were in many cases re-introduced as a field modification and a few less instruments, the cockpit we have for the B-25J could be used without really modifying that anything else that was different in the cockpit would not be in the view of the pilot.

It's against the agreement between Daidalos and Maddox Games just to "recycle" existing cockpits. The answer is still no to that solution. ;)

I'm not arguing with that understand but would it be safe to say that in the entire sim with so many of the same general type that no part of any original cockpit was recycled from one Spit or 109 to another? I mean in the spirit of the said agreement we wouldn't want a B-25 cockpit in a B-17 anyway but a B-25 to another B-25? Would that be forbidden?