| Tolwyn |
02-25-2011 04:36 PM |
My "no" vote did have a caveat, and you've hit it.
There is certainly a benefit for a "realistic" 6DOF in the game. To ignore it is exactly throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It would have to be limited (and frankly, I think the "limitations" or, what we call in the business gimbal restrictions would turn a gimmicky thing into a GREAT thing).
My point was that to make it realistic would still not make the majority happy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAim
(Post 227593)
I'm not sure that I really want to get into this, but as a fan of 6Dof I suppose I'll risk it......
Isn't the whole argument that 6Dof isn't perfect so it's no good, kinda throwing the baby out with the bathwater? The system in use now is just as wrong, (granted, it was the best we had when Il2 was developed) and 85% of the respondents seem to agree that the 6Dof that is so far available is the better choice.
In the interest of reason I'd be more than happy if DT were to implement a somewhat more restrictive version of 6Dof, but if it isn't practical within the confines of IL2's code (and DT's other constraints) the version that is available now is better than what we've got IMO (and quite a few others).
|
|
