Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update, February 24, 2012 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=29967)

Jatta Raso 02-24-2012 04:52 PM

great, now tanks. i believe more pressing matters lie within the AC but what the heck.

anyway i think this is kind of a side feature, in order to enhance the possibility of air-to-ground attacks on front line type engagements. that, on a scenario like the upcoming BOM, may be very interesting, like having missions where you have to destroy certain amount of armor before they reach some urban defensive perimeter (like Moscow), maybe capturing some defense airfields on the way and limiting defenders' AC readiness. of course the attacking AC would try to clear the skies over the advancing ground force. this could be very interesting, if it works..

let's just hope they don't overmodel Panzer IV and undermodel T-34... ;)

speculum jockey 02-24-2012 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dano (Post 393807)
It's hardly a trick, they need to widen the audience and it's one way of doing so.

I think that there are better ideas, in order of importance.

1. fix the core game engine and bugs (in progress)
2. fix co-op (in progress?)
3. Add additional content (no mention)
4. Add additional aircraft, campaigns, etc.
.
.
.
.
.
53. Add tanks.

ACE-OF-ACES 02-24-2012 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 393827)
I think that there are better ideas, in order of importance.

1. fix the core game engine and bugs (in progress)
2. fix co-op (in progress?)
3. Add additional content (no mention)
4. Add additional aircraft, campaigns, etc.
5. go out of business due to lack of funds
.
.
.
.
.
53. Add tanks.

Fixxed that for ya

Luffe 02-24-2012 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jatta Raso (Post 393826)
great, now tanks. i believe more pressing matters lie within the AC but what the heck.

let's hope they don't overmodel Panzer IV and undermodel T-34... ;)

At least the threads pointing out, that the seatcovers of the german haltrack, are not the correct shade of saurkraut-brown will be entertaining.

Dano 02-24-2012 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 393827)
I think that there are better ideas, in order of importance.

1. fix the core game engine and bugs (in progress)
2. fix co-op (in progress?)
3. Add additional content (no mention)
4. Add additional aircraft, campaigns, etc.
.
.
.
.
.
53. Add tanks.

Did I say it was a good idea?

BH_woodstock 02-24-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 393772)
BF3 and ARMA main focus is on FPS..

ARMA IMHO is the most realistic FPS todate..

But with that said BF3 and ARMA both suck at flight sims, wrt realism..

It is just in there to give those who get borred playig FPS all the time something else to do.. And something for otehrs to shoot at! ;)

The idea here is 1C is doing the same..

Only difference is 1C's main focus is on FLIGHT..

At least I hope that is the case! No one here knows for sure and anyone other than BS who claims to know is just blowing smoke

I was just expecting a graphics engine improvement and was impressed at first when seeing the video.Now i am concerned because instead CLoD just went a total different direction here.Its fantastic that the game engine can handle all this with supposedly better frame rates but IMO the majority here would just like to get the game 100% before all these cool neat features are added.Is there any word on coops in this patch?

Force10 02-24-2012 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES (Post 393828)
Fixxed that for ya


#5 would not apply if #1 was done in a timely fashion.

ACE-OF-ACES 02-24-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BH_woodstock (Post 393832)
I was just expecting a graphics engine improvement and was impressed at first when seeing the video.Now i am concerned because instead CLoD just went a total different direction here.Its fantastic that the game engine can handle all this with supposedly better frame rates but IMO the majority here would just like to get the game 100% before all these cool neat features are added.Is there any word on coops in this patch?

wood! long time no type! S! ;)

no word on eta of patch as far as I know :(

SiThSpAwN 02-24-2012 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vyllis (Post 393825)
I am the only one tank simmer that is not excited by theses videos?

Until trees can have collision i can see tanks driving trough entire forests...

I can remove or add buildings and/or forest in the CLODO settings (almost cheat). You want tank game, Fix this.

No infantry or infantry positions to shoot at/cover?

Yes the multiplayer aspect and graphical are great, but right now, i'm not interested.

Correct me if some statements are wrong.

These are early development teaser videos, you dont know what it will be like when its released, it may have all you commented on.

ACE-OF-ACES 02-24-2012 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Force10 (Post 393833)
#5 would not apply if #1 was done in a timely fashion.

if..

And 'if' monkies flew out of my butt waring red hats and holding ray-guns I could rule the world


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.