![]() |
i vote for a placebo patch every friday
make it 3gb and say it changes colour and slight touches in the fm |
Saturday May 05 update by BlackSix:
"The bugs (n-1) are still present ... We hate it more than you guys ..." Be sure :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I thought you might provide the link from your own crystal ball? |
Quote:
There's a touch of brilliance in your post, Raaaid! LOL |
That's actually a good idea. Brilliant idea! Could be a study for school.
|
Quote:
|
BlackSix No Friday Update 4 May
Hi just in case you don't know B6 has posted on the Fresh Stuff From sukhoi.ru thread
About Friday Update: We will work on Saturday and I think what I'll have some news tomorrow. Maybe. I hope) |
The shame and dishonor for the dev's at 1C must be too much to bear. :evil:
|
Just tried the placebo 3gb patch and the colours are all wrong and the new FM's are porked. :grin:
|
Quote:
|
Thx for the info.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://images.google.de/imgres?q=sup...9,r:4,s:0,i:79 :) . |
And two more posts on the topic:
Quote:
Quote:
|
:grin:
|
Lets see what tomorrow brings then.
|
|
I wonder where he is now? :grin:
|
last time i saw him post was over at ubi just after BG passed in his memorial thread.
wherever he is, you can bet he still has trim on a slider;) |
Quote:
|
|
My hand stucked... I can't get it off F5 button...will keep pressing it until next Friday.
|
Forgive me, but is it hard to wait until the 19:00 before opening a new thread? :grin:
People, be patients! :) |
Thanks for the heads up!
~S~ |
|
Now that brings back memories... ALL BAD! ;)
|
Ok, now everybody can open new threads about the Friday Update... :-P
|
the suspense is killing me!!!
|
Can i open a thread called "where is the Saturday update?" :grin:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not sure what everyone is getting exited about when they are only going to give you an update on the bugs they were working on last week. The only time I will jump for joy is when they actually release a patch.
|
I hear it should be ready by at least 2015 ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Considering the bugs that have popped up and a couple of them have been showing their ugly heads for a while now id say it isn't anywhere near finished yet.. certainly not within the next month or so |
Quote:
|
|
Considering that 6 months ago there was only one major bug, something to do with the decals, which when fixed caused a far worse bug 'particles causing slowdown' which when fixed caused even more major bugs, one could be forgiven for wondering if fixing all these will create multiple major bugs as that seems to be the current trend.
|
You mean they should follow the principle of not fixing what is not broke?
:cool: Seems not to be that easy. I don´t think they are all nerds. But it is no wonder one gets impatient after that long time. |
Quote:
|
No update huh.....
Is this thing broken beyond repair? When the game came out i already had my doubts about the engine and voila here we are still wondering what went wrong. This patch better be betterthen expected else im gonna compare this situation with Greece and we all know what that means... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Isn't there an email system that alerts you to when the beta patch is out because I'll take that.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It'll be ready when it is ready.... constant whinging won't get it here any sooner |
2 month isn't such a bad guess. About 6 months in my opinion.
|
Quote:
But sadly that is not how it goes with complex software sometimes Maybe an analogy will help? What your asking the devs to do is tell us NOW, how lost their car keys are before they found their car keys Problem is you don't know how lost your car keys are until you find your car keys For example.. Quote:
What we do want the programer to do is move onto the next bug as soon as he finds his keys |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I vote for option 1. (Hmmm maybe this should be a poll?)
And I, for one, am very grateful for any information given. Keep up the good work! I’m looking forward to future updates and the sequel in development! Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That double facepalm picture is looking hilarious. Thanks for posting. :D
Looking forward to the announcements in the coming next week. I hope the Su26 will be part of it :P |
Quote:
Well if 1C would clarify FM&performace subcject and would inform us what they are planning to do and what bug and errors are known i think any facepalm would be not nessesery for any side. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think Luthier is Alexander I think you are Sergei ...and we are the crowd...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkdDO...layer_embedded I expect I'll get an off-topic infraction for that. You may need 'Alexander' to translate :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is not an answer at all. I'm asking for an improvement (if will never have it) in the cloud shapes with DX10, after 11 years from IL2 release...... Thank for the link Jumo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can't help myself but I highly suspect that there will be no compatibility of CloD and the sequel anymore. :(
|
Quote:
They have said many times, that alot will be fixed in the sequel witch allso fix issus in CLOD. Im pretty shure there will be alot of improvement that effect CLOD in the furture due the sequels. But CLOD as a standolone will be left not finalized, but flyable. |
Quote:
Just saying... |
I think it's a new game that is being written, with models and maps from the COD game, but I would hazard a guess that it is installed on top of the existing one anyway. That explains why this is taking so long and why some things will be missed out on COD. If you are expecting everything in COD to be fixed standalone I don't expect that, and that's no different to the first IL2 - you had to buy sequels for changes and more kit regardless of what you thought of the first game + patches.
We know that the netcode sucks, it's refreshing to know that it was ripped up and started again. I just hope that it's not going to suck like the current one does :rolleyes: I feel burned, personally, so I'll definitely wait to see the response of the community before buying the sequel. I'm not going through this again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
well.... like always we are in the cloud :)
it is sad that B6 ha not the permission to speak about the sequel. it is strange that the fact that the sequel will be able to merge with CLOD is not confirmed. because it will be logical that it will. the lack of communication (i blame here the dev team and not B6) is still so bad. i just hope the sequel will really do all promise make. because like it start, the sequell will more be a patch to pay that an real sequel. i still believe in CLOD. i want to believe. but if the sequel suffer problem at his release that is certainly the dead of this sim. i hope the dev team will understand that comm is important and more important when a sim a such problem that CLOD. please don't make us regret to give you are trust. it is all i ask. now time will show us the result. |
No more fixes ? Goodbye features (weather and so ) ? Way out is there please and no money for 1C !
|
Quote:
...and make the bomber pilot population even smaller? :confused: |
Quote:
|
It is a huge leap of faith BOM is even released.
|
If the sequel is to be a stand alone game, and CLoD is left to wither and die, I'd regard that as an absolute breach of faith on the part of the Development Team. I personally have no objection to paying to use new aircraft or, if it comes to that, paying for the right to 'transfer' to a different front. If that's what it takes to keep the game viable then OK, I'll go along with it. However, I would certainly feel cheated if the existing game was simply cut loose and abandoned to its fate . Members of the IL-2 community have invested far too much for that to happen. If the DT were to simply abandon the game, I think there is likely to be a very significant decline in community trust and goodwill.
|
Don't worry guys Cliffs of Dover is the same upgrades, just like all occurred when IL2 Sturmovik first came out and received core engine upgrades.
Same goes for Cliffs of Dover. I remember Oleg said it and Luthier said it. |
I think the reputation of CloD is now so poisonous that it would be better for 1C to put as much distance between BoM and CloD as possible. A simple statement that CloD is finished would probably be for the best, accompanied by a radically different branding for BoM. The current state of play is not doing 1C's reputation any good at all and a clean break would at least give them a chance to put it behind them as a noble failure and move on to something more worthwhile. A clean break might also give them the chance to make any necessary personnel changes.
|
Just fix this bugged and unfinished engine and call this the way 1C want.
Simples as that. |
Quote:
If they were going to go with a whole new game engine then sure, but if they are going to use the core of CloD on a sequel it would be IMHO irresponsible to fix things in the sequel and not patch CloD as well, even if its after the release of the sequel, now I am not talking about playability issues, those MUST be fixed before the sequel, but things like net code, additions like weather... they should all be added to CloD if they are made to work in the sequel as well... abandoning CloD and pretending it doesnt exist would only leave the devs with a very deep scar that would follow them for years to come... Of course now we drift off topic, and we should be focused on getting CloD to the level it needs to be to move forward... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
+1 |
Quote:
I couldn't say it better. |
i juste hope this time when the sequel will be release we will pay a real sim and not a beta like cliffs of dover was.
hope that it will be the last time we have to pay 2 times a game to have a release version of it. hope that my trust in CLOD won't be betray. now i really like to have some news from the dev about something (even a picture of new color cow.) because we are already so frustrated to let us in the cloud of info. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Clod is still the very best available, for people to enjoy WWII air combat:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What is also sad is that the $50. is only worth 8.4 meals for one, at the McDonald's franchise.:) |
Quote:
One is the core content which should benefit CoD even if we have to wait for BoM and merge it because it should have the same core structure. This is where 1C seem to be spending almost all of their efforts. The other is the much less complex issue of CoD content, or bob as it is in the file structure. These things are not difficult to fix, primarily FMs and DMs i.e. the objects unique to bob/CoD. Look at the bob folder .SFS files. 3do - not sure what this is. 3d models with DM modules? buildings - who really cares at this stage? ground - ditto humans - ditto maps - they've already told us the map won't be changed and its acceptable plane - MOST important. The FMs are way off and DMs are not all ok (flaming flying 109s) speech - who cares and so on. I don't know what the other files are for but you can see where I'm going. We have an environment which could probably be left alone and a core game that will be fixed. However, we have CoD/bob aircraft that badly need fixing. If 1C don't deliver on the CoD/bob content (i.e. aircraft that fly as they should) they will have failed miserably for the sake of a minimal amount of work. It will remain laughable as a representation of the BoB and for what? Remember, almost all of the fixes needed are core fixes not CoD/bob fixes. CoD, or SOW-BoB was to have been the jewel in Oleg Maddox's new flight combat simulation. That's why it was never allowed in IL-2 '46. It was the iconic air battle, the almost set piece of the Douhet theories and with only one other Victory-by-Air battle like it, Malta. The pacific battles needed air power but were not of the same nature. If such simple fixes are ignored and the iconic air battle of the war is left in the mud the reputation of CoD and 1C will be more than poisonous. IMHO of course. |
when i read these 20 pages and all the words and discussions to come, i can only conclude what i and others said months ago, and believe me i was living in hope for 5-6 years,but this is my personal opinion ( so i won't go into any discussion):
http://i287.photobucket.com/albums/l...ooo/kruis5.jpg very, very, very pitty indeed, what a wasted potential. I wish you all the best Over and out Sincerely Tigertooo |
you demand best yet look at your system
Quote:
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=Abbeville-Boy;457587]you demand best yet look at your system
I have no idea what you mean??? |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=smink1701;457599]
Quote:
He means that he thinks your computer is too slow to run CLOD well... Personally I think your system is not bad at all. Maybe if I were you i would overclock the CPU (+CPU cooler) and a Nvidia GTX670. Then your system will be up to date again! ;) |
Quote:
With every iteration of the original il2 series, came further advancements and capability. For those whow would... please don't start the hassling for the "get the new product out asap/ I would pay whatever to see it here". Don't bring those pressures to bear - look what happened last time. |
My guess is that they are working flat out on the BOM and have a hampster in a little cage working on CLOD.
They need an income and the only way to get it is to have another product that will hopefully get great reviews and sell well thus saving the company. B.O.M. = B.etter than O.ur last M.other--- |
Quote:
They have to get money to make the game so they make a new add on to get it and fix the old problems along with it. I think it's going to be just fine. Even for the CloD. You act here like the game is the shittiest peace of grab ever and that is not true. Planes are flyable and I'm flying almost every day on ATAG server. True everything is not perfect but so what? Give an example of a better WW2 flight simulator than this. Looking at the comments on this forum makes it feel like the game would be not even playable witch is just not true, so stop whining because it's not exactly what you wanted. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.