Did they give some answers in the meantime?
Can't find them, didn't they say this evening?

I think you might be jumping to conclusions.

He said:
1. They have to reach one milestone first (getting the game stable).
2. Release the Final Patch
3. Release Battle of Moscow to install and merge with CoD.

The reaching of the 'milestone' itself might require further patches.
This is how I read the update.

I think the 'Next time it will be updated...' refers to the next time we install something AFTER the milestone has been reached (not the next time we install).

I think their policy is wrong, work on the sequel and not finish Cliffs of Dover is a mistake, I don´t have more confidence in your products, to buy their, who assures me that the sequel will work 100%

I don't usually say much, but, how can you release a "Sequel" to a game that has not been corrected or finnished in a stable condition?.....that is just adding problems onto problems with no solutions in site.........:(.........

+1 will never ever buy from this developer (developer thats a joke) again.

Their policy is the only one available to them. Not working on the Sequel now would be fatal to the development. The development knows full well they will live or die depending on sales of the Sequel, and very few will buy it unless they know there are MAJOR improvements.

If that were true they would release the Sequel now with all the game engines faults. This is one of the reasons the Sequel will be a year or two away to give them time to fix these faults, not just to make the maps, missions, and aircraft.

The real problem here is that there is no competition... at all.

We need competition for CoD so these guys can get off their backsides and give us what we paid for!

agree with that

clod was a beta and a money maker for their eastern front. but its still the best out there, which sucks.

sorry uther did i say something wrong? i see you edited my post already, but havent actually changed anything? :confused: