Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=132)
-   -   name this plane (for fun) (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=10953)

Robotic Pope 01-31-2010 10:25 PM

Avro Lincoln

Panzergranate 02-02-2010 04:47 AM

1 Attachment(s)
The correct answer was the P-66 Vultee Vangard.

The Valient and the Texan were both derived from it as it was not that brilliant as a fighter, being found to be inferiour to the P-40 when in US Army service in 1941 - 1942.

Bearing in mind that the P-40 was not a brilliant fighter when compared to European and Japanese fighters, you can see why it was passed on pretty quickly to the Canadians and the Chinese.

All Japenese Army aircraft are preceeded by the "Ki" monicker.

Ki-21 "Helen" twin engined bomber.
Ki-27 "Claude" fixed undercarriage mono-plane fighter.
Ki-43 "Oscar" fighter.

Try this one......

Clues:

Derived from the failed NF-1 US Navy first mono-plane fighter competition fighter. (It failed to leave the ground during the contest).

This is regarded as the least successful fighter of WW2 with just 1.5 kills from just over 1,000 aircraft built.

Flown also by the Australians for home defence only.

It was very fast at 380 MPH but suffer from poor agility and maniverability.

A very famous WW2 fighter was developed from it.

So what is it??

Soviet Ace 02-02-2010 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 141057)
The correct answer was the P-66 Vultee Vangard.

The Valient and the Texan were both derived from it as it was not that brilliant as a fighter, being found to be inferiour to the P-40 when in US Army service in 1941 - 1942.

Bearing in mind that the P-40 was not a brilliant fighter when compared to European and Japanese fighters, you can see why it was passed on pretty quickly to the Canadians and the Chinese.

All Japenese Army aircraft are preceeded by the "Ki" monicker.

Ki-21 "Helen" twin engined bomber.
Ki-27 "Claude" fixed undercarriage mono-plane fighter.
Ki-43 "Oscar" fighter.

Try this one......

Clues:

Derived from the failed NF-1 US Navy first mono-plane fighter competition fighter. (It failed to leave the ground during the contest).

This is regarded as the least successful fighter of WW2 with just 1.5 kills from just over 1,000 aircraft built.

Flown also by the Australians for home defence only.

It was very fast at 380 MPH but suffer from poor agility and maniverability.

A very famous WW2 fighter was developed from it.

So what is it??

P-36 Hawk

FOZ_1983 02-02-2010 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 141057)
The correct answer was the P-66 Vultee Vangard.

The Valient and the Texan were both derived from it as it was not that brilliant as a fighter, being found to be inferiour to the P-40 when in US Army service in 1941 - 1942.

Bearing in mind that the P-40 was not a brilliant fighter when compared to European and Japanese fighters, you can see why it was passed on pretty quickly to the Canadians and the Chinese.

All Japenese Army aircraft are preceeded by the "Ki" monicker.

Ki-21 "Helen" twin engined bomber.
Ki-27 "Claude" fixed undercarriage mono-plane fighter.
Ki-43 "Oscar" fighter.

Try this one......

Clues:

Derived from the failed NF-1 US Navy first mono-plane fighter competition fighter. (It failed to leave the ground during the contest).

This is regarded as the least successful fighter of WW2 with just 1.5 kills from just over 1,000 aircraft built.

Flown also by the Australians for home defence only.

It was very fast at 380 MPH but suffer from poor agility and maniverability.

A very famous WW2 fighter was developed from it.

So what is it??

And how many of these vanguards were used in the film tora tora tora? i count erm....none!!

Do you just wiki this stuff? ;) lol.

juz1 02-02-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 141057)
The correct answer was the P-66 Vultee Vangard.

The Valient and the Texan were both derived from it as it was not that brilliant as a fighter, being found to be inferiour to the P-40 when in US Army service in 1941 - 1942.

Bearing in mind that the P-40 was not a brilliant fighter when compared to European and Japanese fighters, you can see why it was passed on pretty quickly to the Canadians and the Chinese.

All Japenese Army aircraft are preceeded by the "Ki" monicker.

Ki-21 "Helen" twin engined bomber.
Ki-27 "Claude" fixed undercarriage mono-plane fighter.
Ki-43 "Oscar" fighter.

Try this one......

Clues:

Derived from the failed NF-1 US Navy first mono-plane fighter competition fighter. (It failed to leave the ground during the contest).

This is regarded as the least successful fighter of WW2 with just 1.5 kills from just over 1,000 aircraft built.

Flown also by the Australians for home defence only.

It was very fast at 380 MPH but suffer from poor agility and maniverability.

A very famous WW2 fighter was developed from it.

So what is it??

Wiki says the P-33 Ferris Bueller, famously flown by Casius Clay at the Battle of Punanni

Vulcan607 02-02-2010 05:59 PM

Points to the mechanical pontiff for the lincon, didnt fall for the trap of saying lanc

stealth finger 02-02-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 141057)
This is regarded as the least successful fighter of WW2 with just 1.5 kills from just over 1,000 aircraft built.

0.o

Vulcan607 02-03-2010 07:04 PM

keeping the ball rolling
http://tinyurl.com/yhes867

Spitfire23 02-03-2010 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcan607 (Post 141489)
keeping the ball rolling
http://tinyurl.com/yhes867

That be a Blackburn Buccaneer, but this one seems to have invisible landing gear ;)

Panzergranate 02-03-2010 07:44 PM

I trawled through websites dedicated to "were also in service" fighters such as the P-66.

The P-66 formed the backbone of the early Taiwanese airforce and was involved in the Chinese Civil War against Mao's communists, as was the mystery aircraft.

The mystery aircraft isn't a P-36 Hawk. The P-36 is a Curtis designed aircraft, whilst the NF-1 was designed by Severesky before it became Republic.

This fighter was Republic's very first design and build contract for lend-lease only.

The P-47 was a scaled up version of this aircraft.

So what is it??

Vulcan607 02-03-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitfire23 (Post 141500)
That be a Blackburn Buccaneer, but this one seems to have invisible landing gear ;)

yeah special varient

The_Goalie_94 02-03-2010 10:35 PM

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA280_.jpg
Just for those who play XD

Soviet Ace 02-03-2010 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panzergranate (Post 141501)
I trawled through websites dedicated to "were also in service" fighters such as the P-66.

The P-66 formed the backbone of the early Taiwanese airforce and was involved in the Chinese Civil War against Mao's communists, as was the mystery aircraft.

The mystery aircraft isn't a P-36 Hawk. The P-36 is a Curtis designed aircraft, whilst the NF-1 was designed by Severesky before it became Republic.

This fighter was Republic's very first design and build contract for lend-lease only.

The P-47 was a scaled up version of this aircraft.

So what is it??

P-43 Lancer!

Gilly 04-07-2010 02:17 PM

Not so much as name the plane as which is the genuine plane!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...-pictures.html

f1rebrand 04-07-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gilly (Post 153604)
Not so much as name the plane as which is the genuine plane!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...-pictures.html

I was just looking at that, Gilly.

Here's an interesting link: http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2009/1...-of-deception/

Robotic Pope 04-07-2010 03:15 PM

OMG It Lives!! lol

OT I wonder how much they cost. I want one of the Mig 29's lol That would give the google maps people a supprise

markyboyacebassist 04-08-2010 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gilly (Post 153604)
Not so much as name the plane as which is the genuine plane!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pict...-pictures.html

Blimey, you'd need a pair of bellows up your backside to blow one of those mothers up!:-P:-P

FOZ_1983 04-08-2010 07:06 PM

I'd love to have one of them in my back yard!! Or a harier jump jet. Then have google earth as my screen saver haha.

Anyone looking for my house on google earth and ask which is mine...

Yeah erm..its the one with the harrier jump jet in the back yard haha.



On a serious note though, they do look very effective from the air.

bobbysocks 04-08-2010 08:59 PM

i was looking for a link about the fake tanks and trucks the allies used to deceive the germans about D-day and out strength and found this. WOW talk about pulling off a good hide job...!!

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/ww2-dec...t18644-10.html

oh...further down on this links...which is actually a forum...shows the allied tank..

House MD 221B 10-01-2010 11:20 PM

I reckon it's the lower left one :) the decoy stuff was really cool.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.