Originally Posted by LennysCopilot (Post 486301)

Would it be possible to add HVAR rockets to the loadout for the FM-2 Wildcat? Thanks for all of your hard work!

Originally Posted by T}{OR (Post 486594)

Can something be done to the AI carrier landing routine? Currently it takes them ages to land on the carrier. Maybe cutting the distance at which they start the final approach to half what we currently have or re-doing it completely...


Thanks

Originally Posted by Fighterace (Post 486368)

Or a P-51K

Originally Posted by panzer1b (Post 475615)

bf109 ... F1 ... (a nice midway between the mg151/15 and thbe mg151/20....

Originally Posted by 1984 (Post 486898)

it's p-51d with another prop and a little bit worse speed? and how much worse this version? i think, even if - 10 kph, it's reason for...

plus, p-51d now 25 lbs, if I'm not mistaken, so need and 18 lbs performance...

and mustang III in game have realistic performance? apparently, it's 25 lbs, but with >605 kph at sl...



i agree with you, 20mm gun, but not mg151/20 it's good for balance, historically correct and, maybe, DT can do this version without correct ammo counter? if i'm not mistaken, yak-9k - "На приборной доске в кабине летчика был установлен счетчик оставшихся снарядов пушки." - but, and nothing...

although, it's not serious changes and we can wait, and when plane are correct it's good... but and variant when f-1 included and finished off later, i think, not so unacceptable...

next, if we talking about Fs, what about f-2 with and f-4 without armor glass (it's protection, of course, and + - 10 kph?, i seen and read something like this, so, why not if this historically correct and can changed performance of aircraft)…

and generally speaking, maybe, for all aircrafts need some new mechanism or new option like choice of loadouts, skins, etc, for different equipment, although, sometimes more optimal it’s "different" planes of one type how now...

Originally Posted by IceFire (Post 487044)

Yep...not sure why we'd want a P-51K. Produced in a different factory with a different but similar propeller, a slightly differently shaped canopy, and I think one of the vents uses a different design but aside from that it's a carbon copy of the P-51D and in no way a benefit for us to have it.

Originally Posted by MicroWave (Post 486598)

There is an option for landing pattern in FMB. Try with Short Left/Short Right.
I can't remember if it works for carriers or not. :???:

Originally Posted by 1984 (Post 487091)

in total agree, but if DT wanted rework p-51s, do K maybe it's not so hard especially if he more slowly (it's main reason)...

well, it's all mainly something like "perfection", of course...

if need to select, more D-xx with new weapon for all theaters (what really need, agree with many opinions here), or K, my choice D and hvar etc too...



oh, exactly, "polished" etc... forgot about this... and i asked because wanted to say, if mustang III have correct performance, maybe need mustang IV who intercepted V-1 too (how i read)...



maybe, you not flying much times against pe-2 ?:) shkas very dangerous for pilot of E/F, especially without armor glass - more than UBT, i think, because many times was "killed" or had damaged oil cooler, sometimes, even oil cooler+lost ailerons at >500 m - and if you climbing behind fast "peshka" (main attack position in online wars)... plus, glass reduce speed... well, 2 reasons, why not...

of course, it's only my opinion and i'm writing too many little things...



if author of book, Степанец, right, yak-9k had ammo counter, only for ns-45, and we not have this in game...

Originally Posted by 1984 (Post 487091)

oh, exactly, "polished" etc... forgot about this... and i asked because wanted to say, if mustang III have correct performance, maybe need mustang IV who intercepted V-1 too (how i read)...

Originally Posted by 1984 (Post 487091)

If author of book, Степанец, right, yak-9k had ammo counter, only for ns-45, and we not have this in game...