+1

i don't see any "green puke".

Or in other words: lack of visual talent. Which basically means keeping the capability of fair judgement of ones own work even after many hours have been invested. Talented people keep evaluating other options, while less talented people are blind with pride once they get anything done (i know more about this than i'd like to...).

Between all the technical topics in both computer stuff and simulated plane stuff the visual aspect was obviously lost. The mentality was probably a lot like "if it's ugly, throw more triangles at it". The problem with this is, in addition to the obvious performance pitfall, that "more triangles" will not automatically translate to "more beauty": If the basic visual content is good, then putting more technical resources to work on it (more triangles, higher texture resolutions, more shader fx) will certainly make it look even better. But if the basic visual content is lacking, no amount of technology you throw at it will make it look good.

Considering the (over?) ambitous level of detail of the CoD project and the anti-creative nature of a sim that above all tries to be very accurate (so it's more an investigative process than a creative one), this lack of what i call visual talent should not come as a big surprise.

Maybe the "Forgotten Battles" of CoD will be used as an opportunity to mend some of those visual aspects. If, with a few bulk operations on the texture sets the general color palette can be made a lot more enjoyable this might even be the key ingredient to make this hypothetical "Forgotten Battles Junior" really feel a bit like a new (even if related) game and less like a pay-patch.

This sim is not bad visually but it's looking half finished on that matter.
To me of course.

Maybe recycling the terrain in WOP format and COD avoided a lot of problems and bugs.Also the win in FPS can be considerable. Maybe a little less cosmetic but in this way the team can worked in the importants things and bugs of the Simultator and less at the side the cosmetic side.

That photo, and every WoP screenshot of England, has a puke green hue to it. If you can't see it, it's because you are desperately trying to pretend it isn't there.

yup

Most of us agreed that at some moments colors in WOP are over saturated, but I think what most of us mean is that graphically speaking wop looks way better and if we overlook this excessive color saturation, buildings, trees look better implemented in the landscape.

People can say, WOP maps are smaller, agreed fm and dm is not as good as in IL2 COD but, I play both and wop feels much more immersive in the graphical aspect(only :grin:) sometimes almost photo realistic.

I am the one who would really like to see WOP graphics with IL2 COD.

Yes, if you can ignore the fact that the WoP colors are laughably bad it looks great. Sadly, I can't ignore colors so bad that they make my eyes bleed.

End all of these sentences with "for now". CoD isn't and doesn't have a completion goal. It's a journey. It will have all you can stand and more.