+1.a comment on this issue and the whole thread would cease to exist.

lobisomem why do you continue to say people dont have a real life because they say things are wrong with this game??

it comes down to the fact that me, and probably many others have to work about half a day to pay for this unfinished product. for me this is a hobby, playing flight sims and other games, but in between work, spending time with my son and girlfriend i want to play a game that works, not mess about with broken crap. if i knew it didnt work i wouldnt have bought it, simple. perhaps its different for you, perhaps your life is so fulfilled that in between snorting cocaine off prostitutes bottoms, hitting golf balls from the deck of your million $ yacht and going to parties with jonny depp, you can play for half an hour then go for a dump and wipe your ass on a $50 note.

and if your game works go play it a lot more instead of coming here and trolling, or is the fact that no one is in multiplayer ruining your fun??

LOL...great post!

No, it's not a "great post" at all. Just another whinner post.

You guys are simmers or gammers? You like to spend money in the last FPS franchise title, like CoD, and have some SP fun one day and spend one week more in brainless SP "Quake" style? You want that from CloD?!?!

That's what appears to me... all this CRAP about "trees don't have collision meshes, the terrain looks ugly, the SP are broken, we have MP sound bug"...

I fly in IL-2 for TEN YEARS! I fly all this time not because of some "SP campaign"... Not for some "bug free airquake" from release! I'm a simmer, I like the SIMULATION aspect of the series, like to see good FM, DM, have tools to the community create own scenarios, campaigns, etc. I DON'T NEED A PERFECT PRODUCT FROM RELEASE, I DON'T SEE CLOD AS A NEW FPS TITLE, IT'S THE NEXTGEN AIR COMBAT SIMULATOR, WITH LARGE LIFESPAM!

If you want to "play a game", go for a game. You don't understand what it's all about. It's much more than a "game", that's why a lot of fools can't see 0.1% of the capabilities of the software and talk a lot of CRAP!

Simple as that. I have a girlfriend, work, and are really glad to pay like 50 dollars for this software. I know I'll be flying in it more ten years... And I'm flying in it NOW!

Reporting bugs is one thing. What people are doing now is just brainless whinning.

you by yourself are a all new type of whiner the "Im-rich-my-game-works-soe-everyone-elses-msut-work-too-whinner"

and yes. It was a GREAT post.

I would have thought that simulating the real-life landscape was something that CloD should have aspired to. As it is now, it has an fantasy landscape.

im a simmer and a gamer, and have been since i can remember, it is my hobby, my next door neighbour plays cricket as a hobby, but he uses a fully working cricket bat, not one thats snapped in half and broken.

Next time you play the game or get on a plane try not to take LSD... What is so bad about the landscape I KNOW it would be nice to have hedges and the colours could be tweaked but in the grand scheme of things the ground does not look bad in fact its the opposite it looks very good.

Ooh, the irony. :cool:

......

Everything can be improved, and CloD is not alone. Realistic campaigns; a representative BoB scenario? This is what I want, and CloD doesn't have it. BoB2 does, and BoB2 does it beautifully. Aside from a dated DM (and dated graphics) BoB2 offers all of what you have said to the offline player, so where does CloD come into this? A long 'lifespam'? Yes, definitely, but the question is when?
Luthier himself has always advocated constructive criticism, and largely that is what this topic is made of. The landscape can be improved, for many it currently detracts from the immersion, and if it can be improved, why not tailor it to the community? Many of whom live in Blighty and can offer a lot of useful advise.

I think it's clear that the terrain is still very much WIP, but official comment on this would put a lot of minds at rest. Indeed, I'm sure many would welcome trees which are as poor as RoF's up-close if it meant they had hit-boxes, and looked awesome from any distance other than 2-metres away. Trees which have individual leaves are awesome, but most of my flying happens at altitudes above 3-metres ;)

I'm not rich. My system isn't an expensive one. I just have a brain and can build a rig that runs new titles Ok.

I can run this title in a HD 4850 512MB lowering the textures. If people can't configure settings, go buy a console.